McConnell Open To Slightly Bigger Infrastructure Plan As Week Of Negotiations Begins

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 23: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) listens as Republican leaders talk to the media after their weekly lunch at the U.S. Capitol on March 23, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Tas... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 23: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) listens as Republican leaders talk to the media after their weekly lunch at the U.S. Capitol on March 23, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images) MORE LESS
May 10, 2021 3:42 p.m.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) signaled openness to a bigger infrastructure package Sunday, a potentially positive sign to open a week peppered with bipartisan meetings and negotiations.

“The proper price tag for what most of us think of as infrastructure is about six to $800 billion, which Shelley Moore Capito, of my conference, has put together and recommended as a bill that’s related to the subject,” McConnell said during an interview with Kentucky Educational Television before bashing President Joe Biden’s proposal. 

Capito’s proposal actually only rang in at $568 billion, making McConnell’s accepted range a significant step up. 

Of course, Biden’s plans — two complementary pieces, a $2.3 trillion physical infrastructure column and a $1.8 trillion human infrastructure column — dwarf both Republicans’ estimates. But for negotiating purposes, it’s still something.

This week will see Biden meet with congressional leadership, including McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), and a group of Senate Republicans who have been spearheading the infrastructure counter-proposal. While it behooves the White House to look like they’re entertaining Republican proposals even if they ultimately go it alone with Democrats, multiple Democratic members have floated collaborating with Republicans on a narrower “roads and bridges” kind of bill, then bundling remaining provisions into a reconciliation vehicle.

The effort is also required, as senators like Joe Manchin (D-WV) have insisted on trying a bipartisan route before settling on partisan legislation.  

The two sides still disagree on how to pay for the proposals though. Republicans have forbade deficit spending and any change to the tax code post-former President Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, leaving few options. 

“The way to pay for infrastructure is through the gas tax that already exists, and the gap between that and what we’re willing to spend here needs to be credibly paid for, and the best way to pay for infrastructure is with the people who use it,” McConnell said during the Sunday interview. 

Biden wants to pay for the infrastructure plans by raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations. 

Democrats, meanwhile, are wary of spending too much time on bipartisan negotiations. Lessons from the Obama years well-learned, they’re suspicious of being strung along by Republicans given the excruciatingly short window they have to legislate before members shift their focus to reelection. 

“I think there is a good reason for us to proceed with sincere bipartisan negotiations in the next few weeks, not indefinitely, as long as it’s making real progress,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) told reporters a couple weeks ago, adding: “We don’t have a path towards passing $2.3 trillion by reconciliation, without trying.”

This post has been updated.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.
Latest News
Comments are now Members-Only

Non-members are still able to read comments, but will no longer be able to participate. To join the conversation, sign up now and get:

30% Off Annual Prime Membership

TPM strives to build as inclusive a community as financially possible. We offer FREE memberships to those experiencing financial hardship and FREE memberships for students.

View all options
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: