McCarthy Wants To Take His War On COVID Mitigation Rules All The Way To SCOTUS

UNITED STATES - AUGUST 30: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., makes remarks during a roundtable discussion with House Republican ranking members and veterans on the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in the Capitol Visitor Center on Monday, August 30, 2021. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - AUGUST 30: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., makes remarks during a roundtable discussion with House Republican ranking members and veterans on the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in th... UNITED STATES - AUGUST 30: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., makes remarks during a roundtable discussion with House Republican ranking members and veterans on the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in the Capitol Visitor Center on Monday, August 30, 2021. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on Thursday declared that he’s taking his crusade against the House’s proxy voting protocols to the Supreme Court, despite surging cases of COVID-19 throughout the country due to the delta variant.

“Today, we are asking the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution by overturning Speaker Pelosi’s perpetual proxy voting power grab,” McCarthy said in a statement. “Although the Constitution allows Congress to write it’s own rules, those rules cannot violate the Constitution itself, including the requirement to actually assemble in person.”

McCarthy’s statement echoes a talking point among Republicans who paint proxy voting as a practice that works in Democrats’ favor to ensure that they maintain their slim majority.

The proxy voting provision, which allows members to have a colleague vote for them when they cannot be physically present in the chamber, was adopted by the House in March 2020.

CNN notes that the provision has been regularly used among members on both sides of the aisle. Although the provision requires members to attest that they can’t be on the House floor to vote due to the pandemic, CNN reported that members have missed votes to attend political events or trips with the President, citing a review of 185 House votes taken since January.

Neither Republicans nor Democrats have pushed for punishment against members who have used proxy voting outside of its original intent.

House Republicans filed a lawsuit last year to end proxy voting, arguing that constitutional provisions require lawmakers to be physically present to vote. Challenges to the practice have been unsuccessful at the district and appeals court levels.

McCarthy’s aversion to proxy voting comes as several Republicans continue to flout COVID mitigation measures in the chamber.

On Wednesday, Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and Chip Roy (R-TX) were fined by the House Ethics Committee for repeatedly refusing to wear masks on the House floor.

In addition to Greene and Roy, five other Republican lawmakers have been hit with fines for failing to comply with the House floor’s mask mandate: Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY), Ralph Norman (R-SC), Brian Mast (R-FL), Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) and Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA).

Greene, Massie and Norman previously filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in July to challenge the constitutionality of the mask fines. They argue that the fines violate the Constitution’s 27th Amendment, which states a law that alters lawmakers’ pay can’t go into effect until after an election. But that claim appears to lack standing due to the House floor mask mandate technically being a rule.

Read McCarthy’s statement below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Gosh, I remember when Republicans used to complain that the federal courts were being clogged with trivial horseshit like enforcing school dress codes . . . I guess when you’re a Big Important Congresscritter, it makes all the difference!

  2. The stupid SOB is going to lose this one too.

  3. Not necessarily. He’s handing the supreme court a weapon they can use to selectively veto any legislation they dislike: oopsie, you used proxy voting at stage X of passing legislation Y, therefore it is null and void even though it passed the House and Senate and was signed by the president.

    This supreme court really likes to legislate from the bench.

  4. Pro-life, pro-death, pro-life, pro-death. They cannot make up their f_ckin’ minds! But, of course, their pro-life shtick was a fraud from the git go. P.S. McCarthy doesn’t have a mind to make up…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

114 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for amandacorliss Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for benthere Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for zach Avatar for edhedh Avatar for caltg Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for birdford Avatar for evave2 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for garrybee Avatar for trustywoods

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: