The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office will have to end its prosecution of Paul Manafort after a New York court declined to overturn a ruling saying that the case violated state double jeopardy protections.
The ruling effectively brings Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance’s prosecution of Manafort to an end.
Former President Trump pardoned his former campaign chairman in December for the federal convictions that were secured by the Mueller investigation in 2018.
Trump had long been expected to pardon Manafort. Within minutes of the longtime GOP consultant’s federal sentencing in Washington D.C. in March 2019, a New York state grand jury indicted Manafort on mortgage fraud charges based on conduct similar to that which the Mueller investigation had charged.
Manafort the went to federal prison, until the COVID-19 pandemic led to a judge allowing him to serve his sentence in home confinement. That allowance continued until Trump pardoned him last year.
From the beginning of Vance’s prosecution, Manafort’s attorneys argued that the case violated a New York state law that provides for double jeopardy protections against state trials for already-charged federal crimes.
A state judge agreed with that argument in December 2019, dismissing the case after finding that the law only allows for “very narrow exceptions.”
Last week, the state’s highest court declined to hear a petition from Vance’s office to overturn that ruling, effectively killing the prosecution. Manafort had faced 16 felony counts at the state level.
I’m guessing that there are binders full of other charges that Paulie wasn’t pardoned for that can come into play.
Who cares. PROSECUTE TRUMP.
There can be no justice in the land when it is the relationship to the dictator - ahem the president - that determines whether or not one suffers consequences for their actions.
I was never comfortable for charges at both state and federal level until there was something different about them - I hope that Vance has other charges that he can levy against this traitor.
finding that the law only allows for “very narrow exceptions.”
any chance of finding out what those exceptions might be?
being a traitor earning income from numerous countries while catering to trump as a middleman isn’t good enough huh.
I do.
Although I agree wholeheartedly with you that they should prosecute Chiselin’ Trump, I think that it is imperative that they also prosecute those whole enabled, aided, or abetted Chiselin’ Trump in his crimes.