READ: The Template SCOTUS Election-Reversal Lawsuit That Trump Allies Pushed On LA’s AG

Preisdent Donald Trump, left, shakes hands with Kansas Secretary of State and current Republican candidate for Kansas governor Kris Kobach during President Trump’s MAGA rally held in Landon Arena in Topeka, Kansas,... Preisdent Donald Trump, left, shakes hands with Kansas Secretary of State and current Republican candidate for Kansas governor Kris Kobach during President Trump’s MAGA rally held in Landon Arena in Topeka, Kansas, October 6, 2018. (Photo by Mark Reinstein/Corbis via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Before Texas filed a lawsuit that asked the Supreme Court to block President Biden’s win in four battleground states, a draft of the petition was circulated to the Louisiana attorney general’s office.

The template then was very similar to what was eventually filed by Texas on Dec. 8. Much of the same language proposed in the draft lawsuit made it into the final Texas complaint, and certain sections of the two versions are almost word-for-word the same.  But there was one main difference. It was written to be filed by Louisiana, as well as some yet-to-be-determined states, listed as states “A” and “B.” The draft complaint left template language for the future plaintiff state for fill in its lawyer and contact info. It also targeted six battleground states that went for Biden, while the final Texas version only sued four.

As the New York Times previously reported, a group of lawyers seeking to reverse Trump’s loss had turned to Louisiana in late November to bring a case before the Supreme Court, after they had initially been rebuffed by the Texas attorney general’s office. The previously-unreleased draft of the lawsuit they floated to Louisiana’s attorney general was recently obtained by TPM, via a public records request filed by the left-leaning watchdog group American Oversight. Internal communications between the Louisiana office and the Trump-aligned lawyers, which included a former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, were also obtained in American Oversight’s request and shared with TPM.

They show how Kobach repeatedly pestered Attorney General Jeff Landry’s office and what materials were used to pitch Landry on bringing the lawsuit. Much of the content of the emails is redacted. But, as the New York Times reported, the outreach to Attorney General Landry was part of a larger campaign that targeted Republican attorneys general who had previously aligned themselves with Trump. Landry was one of nine attorneys general part of a group called Lawyers for Trump, and at the time also led the Republican Attorneys General Association.

Yet, the newly-obtained emails show how Landry’s associate, Louisiana Solicitor General Elizabeth Murrill, tried to keep at arms’ length the lawyers who were pushing the election-reversal lawsuit.

One of those lawyers was apparently Phillip Jauregui, an attorney who previously represented former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore when Moore was accused of child molestation during his 2017 Senate bid. Jauregui reached out to Murrill, whom Jauregui apparently was in touch with because of an abortion case from Louisiana that had gone to the Supreme Court. Attached to the Nov. 20 email was a document titled “GM State v State Draft 11.20 (002).docx.”

Murrill responded a few hour later to tell Jauregui she was “discussing with Jeff,” while noting the busy schedule her office was facing in the coming weeks.

Jauregui bugged Murrill again three days later and Murrill politely reminded him that she had other big cases she was preparing for.

“I was in moots all day. will see if he is free,” she wrote back.

The following day, Kobach reached out, emailing Murrill himself and, in a separate email, attempting to make contact directly with Attorney General Landry. Much of the Kobach emails to those officials is redacted but their subjects were “Presidential Election Case” and “Presidential Election Suit.”

Attached to the email Kobach sent Landry was a report by “unpaid citizens and volunteer experts.” It alleged “abnormal results” in 11 counties in Pennsylvania — one of the states the Trump allies wanted Louisiana to sue. The materials sent to Landry also included a declaration filed by the former Trump aide Matt Braynard in a seperate lawsuit alleging fraud in Wisconsin, another state whose results were to be challenged in the proposed Supreme Court lawsuit.

In her exchange with Kobach, Murrill assured Kobach, “Jeff is reviewing all of it and Texas is too,” but said she was too tied up on other matters to “engage” on the case just yet.

Kobach reached out to her again on Nov. 25 to ask her to review a version of the lawsuit that had been “revised and streamlined.”

Murrill deflected: “Have you been in touch with Texas?” she asked.

“Someone else in our group has. But if you want to forward this version to your counterpart in TX, please do so,” Kobach wrote.

Attorney General Ken Paxton did eventually agree to file the lawsuit with the Supreme Court. U.S. Justice Department emails that were released this week by the House revealed that Trump allies had pressured the DOJ to bring its own Supreme Court election-reversal case. The DOJ did not bring such a petition, but Paxton’s lawsuit eventually got the support of 17 GOP state attorneys general — including Landry.

Neither Landry’s office, nor Kobach or Jauregui, responded to TPM’s inquiry about the communications.

Read the draft lawsuit materials sent to the Louisiana Attorney General below:

Latest News
242
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Kris Kobach doesn’t have any attorney-client relationship with the State of Louisiana. There does not appear to be any legal basis for those passages to be redacted.

  2. A template drafted by some sorry-assed RW think tank. Along the model of ALEC bills.

    The vast right-wing conspiracy. Hillary wasn’t wrong about that. Most other things, but not that.

  3. Murrill appears to be another hero in this story. Just trying to keep the crazy at arms length.

  4. Is it heroism to not want to smear yourself with shit?

  5. I hope this continues, so we have a full picture of just how hard Republicans tried to overturn the election in time for the vote in 2022. Every bit of this news is disturbing if you care about a functioning democracy, which I think most Americans do…if the Republicans continue their march to make sure they are the only party that can win elections I really think it will hurt them enough that they can’t recapture the Senate and maybe the House (that’s so close that they will probably get it through gerrymandering alone). Democrats really should be running on this…“how can you vote for someone when their party is doing everything they can to remove your right to vote?” should be a refrain spread far and wide.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

236 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for jw1 Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for lastroth Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for kelaine Avatar for shade Avatar for justruss Avatar for evave2 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for bunnyvelour Avatar for dogselfie Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: