Lee Compares Mueller To Pinocchio In Third ‘Shrek’ Movie: ‘Full of Double Negatives’

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) on Sunday compared special counsel Robert Mueller’s explanation of not recommending obstruction of justice charges against President Donald Trump to the comically roundabout legalese used by Pinocchio in the third “Shrek” movie. The senator also falsely said Mueller hadn’t presented any evidence to back up a potential obstruction violation.

“I find pieces of the report a little bit odd,” Lee said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “For example, when he talks about obstruction, I think it’s odd to say I’m not going to make a recommendation but I’m going to sound like I’m making a recommendation. There’s not evidence that I can point to, but nonetheless I couldn’t get there even if I did.”

“It’s kind of strange to spend two years on that and then speak with sort of a tone that is reminiscent of Pinocchio in the movie Shrek Three,” Lee continued, before paraphrasing Mueller: “I’m not going to say that I’m not deciding.”

“It’s full of double negatives, it’s kind of confusing.”

Though Mueller did provide evidence that Trump obstructed justice, he did not recommend charging Trump with the violation — in fact, he “determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment” at all — in part because an existing Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel memo prevents the prosecution of a sitting president.

Mueller did note, however, that “a President does not have immunity after he leaves office” and that “we are unable to reach [the] judgment” that Trump “clearly did not commit obstruction of justice.”

Watch below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. "I think it’s odd to say I’m not going to make a recommendation but I’m going to sound like I’m making a recommendation. "
    It’s odd only because the evidence was so obvious and abundant that he ALMOST can’t help making a recommendation.

  2. Did Sen Lee read the Mueller Repot at all?

  3. Assholes like Sen. Mike Lee are just all the more reason why the impeachment-related hearings must proceed.

  4. He might indeed have. However, he, being a Republican, should be expected to brazenly lie about its contents.

  5. If he’s confused, even with access to lots of help (staff, researchers, even Romney, etc.), then isn’t he saying he’s not up to the task of being a Senator? Or, if he’s speaking this way–acting confused when he’s really not–then isn’t he saying he’s not up to the task of being a Senator? Either way, I’m confused about how come he’s a Senator.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

76 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for hagarwood Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for rocklaverve Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for Ken_a_roni Avatar for harbinger Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for katscherger Avatar for eisenst Avatar for dominic Avatar for justruss Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: