Judge Mulls Release Of Grand Jury Report Into Trump’s Georgia Election Subversion Bid

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 04: (AFP OUT) U.S. President Donald Trump talks to reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on November 4, 2018 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding two Make ... WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 04: (AFP OUT) U.S. President Donald Trump talks to reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on November 4, 2018 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding two Make America Great Again rallies in Georgia and Tennessee today. (Photo by Oliver Contreras-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Georgia state judge on Tuesday will hear arguments on whether to release a report drafted by a grand jury into President Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 election result in that state.

The grand jury, which investigated the election subversion effort for one year, was dissolved two weeks ago.

By then, grand jurors had issued subpoenas and obtained interviews with a series of high-profile Republican witnesses — and some alleged participants — in Trump’s efforts. Those included Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Rudy Giuliani, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R), Gov. Brian Kemp (R), and others.

The result was a lengthy report into the attempt that remains under seal from public eyes. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis can use the report’s recommendations to make a decision on whether to file charges in the matter.

Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney scheduled a hearing for Tuesday for arguments on whether segments of the report should be released to the public. The grand jury’s own recommendation is that they should be made public.

Some of those interviewed — like Giuliani — were informed during the course of the investigation that they were also considered targets of the probe. In keeping with many of his other public stances on matters potentially embarrassing to himself and those around him, Giuliani is expected to argue to keep the report under seal.

But Willis, whose charging decisions remain unknown, could argue for segments of the report to be made available to the public. A coalition of media organizations has also petitioned McBurney to release as much of the report as possible.

The grand jury, court documents show, has focused intently on the element of the election subversion effort known as the fake electors scheme.

The plot saw attorneys working for Trump advise local GOP officials across the country to proceed as if Joe Biden had lost in several key states that he, in fact, had won — a fact that was well known by the time the plan was set in motion. These officials were to go forward with creating slates of pro-Trump electors, which would then go on to Congress and potentially provide a way for state legislators, state officials, Mike Pence, the Supreme Court, or whoever possible to certify them as the real, legitimate electors, thereby assuring Trump’s victory.

It was a harebrained plan, but one that, legal experts have told TPM, may have involved lying to federal officials. The grand jury has interviewed multiple people associated with the effort, and issued a subpoena last year to Kenneth Chesebro, a Trump attorney who helped design the plan.

Attorneys for Trump said on Monday that they would not attend the Tuesday hearing. A clerk for McBurney told TPM that it will be livestreamed on the judge’s YouTube channel.

If Willis chooses to indict Trump based on the report, it will be the first example of a former president ever being charged with a crime.

Notable Replies

  1. The grand jury’s own recommendation is that they should be made public.

    The crooks want it hidden.

  2. “Crooks” is too nice. Those “crooks” are traitors.

  3. Avatar for hoagie hoagie says:

    Come on, Dorothy, time to pull back the curtain!

  4. “In keeping with many of his other public stances on matters potentially embarrassing to himself and those around him, Giuliani is expected to argue to keep the report under seal”

    Oh no, we have to consider the traitor’s fee fees

  5. Traitorous heinous criminals is too nice.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

34 more replies

Participants

Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for zandru Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for sysprog Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for joelopines Avatar for lastroth Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for tao Avatar for hoagie Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for acewrap Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for quickq Avatar for Fire_Joni_Ernst Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: