Judge Dismisses Suit Against Fox News By Citing Tucker Carlson’s ‘Rhetorical Hyperbole’

Fox News host Tucker Carlson discusses 'Populism and the Right' during the National Review Institute's Ideas Summit on March 29, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a defamation suit brought against Fox News by former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who alleged having an affair with Donald Trump before he became president.

Manhattan U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled against McDougal on grounds that Tucker Carlson regularly engages in “rhetorical hyperbole” and “opinion commentary” — essentially arguing that Carlson’s comments on the show cannot be genuinely considered hard, factual news.

“The statements are rhetorical hyperbole and opinion commentary intended to frame a political debate, and, as such, are not actionable as defamation,” Vyskocil wrote.

In reaching her decision, Vyskocil borrowed in part from an argument “persuasively” made by Fox News in Carlson’s defense, saying that the “general tenor” of Carlson’s program suggests to viewers that Carlson is “engaging in ‘exaggeration’ and ‘nonliteral commentary.’”

“Given Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer ‘arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism’” about the Fox News host’s claims, the judge added.

McDougal disputed Carlson’s effort to represent opinion as fact in an email to the Associate Press, saying,”I believe reporting something you know is a lie as ‘news’ or ‘undisputed facts’ is the very definition of malicious.”

Fox News meanwhile hailed the decision — which largely undermines the factual integrity of its primetime host — as a victory for “defenders of the First Amendment.”

The news network said in a statement: “Karen McDougal’s lawsuit attempted to silence spirited opinion commentary on matters of public concern. The court today held that the First Amendment plainly prohibits such efforts to stifle free speech.”

 

Judge Dismisses Karen McDou… by Law&Crime

Latest News
81
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jmacaz jmacaz says:

    Manhattan U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled against McDougal on grounds that Carlson regularly engages in “rhetorical hyperbole” and “opinion commentary”

    Hopefully this does not set a precedent for someone else who regularly engages in rhetorical hyperbole and opinion commentary.

  2. If you say stupid, inflammatory shit all the time, you can’t be held responsible for it any time.

  3. Well thats a load of horse shit

  4. Avatar for jrw jrw says:

    Seems as if this ruling would exempt all of Fox News from lawsuits.

  5. Avatar for theod theod says:

    rhetorical hyperbole = invented bullshit

    I wish the judge used basic language that EVERYONE understood. Deplorables don’t get four-syllable words. They don’t even understand “deplorable.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

75 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for meri Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for sysprog Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for globalguy Avatar for navamske Avatar for theod Avatar for trnc Avatar for inversion Avatar for clearwater Avatar for lastroth Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for edgarant Avatar for noonm Avatar for ekcambridge Avatar for jrw Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for victor_seastrom Avatar for mec Avatar for illlich Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for JorgeP

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: