Eastman Trying To Claim Attorney-Client Privilege Over Thousands Of Emails

BOULDER, CO - APRIL 29: John Eastman, the University of Colorado Boulders visiting scholar of conservative thought and policy, speaks about his plans to sue the university at a news conference outside of CU Boulder o... BOULDER, CO - APRIL 29: John Eastman, the University of Colorado Boulders visiting scholar of conservative thought and policy, speaks about his plans to sue the university at a news conference outside of CU Boulder on Thursday, April 29, 2021. CU relieved Eastman of his public duties after he spoke at President Donald Trump's rally preceding the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6. (Photo by Andy Cross/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former Trump legal adviser John Eastman is attempting to shield thousands of his old work emails from the House Jan. 6 Committee on the basis of attorney-client privilege, according to his latest motion filed on Sunday in his lawsuit against the committee.

Eastman, who was ordered by the judge to sift through more than 94,000 pages in his Chapman University email account to determine which materials were privileged last month, argued on Sunday that the committee doesn’t have a right to access the more than 10,000 pages of what he claims to be privileged documents.

Eastman has handed over more than 8,409 pages of material to the committee and has “reviewed or excluded 46,205 of the 94,153 pages in the total production,” his lawyers stated in the Sunday filing. Of those 46,205 pages, 26,754 were mass emails that were automatically excluded.

That leaves about 11,000 pages so far that the ex-Trump adviser is refusing to hand over.

Eastman’s legal team urged the court to reject the committee’s request for documents due to the lawyer’s attorney-client relationship with ex-President Donald Trump, with whom he plotted to have then-Vice President Mike Pence steal the 2020 election, a scheme Pence ultimately chose not to go along with.

Eastman has been providing logs itemizing his privilege claims to the House committee as ordered, but the committee’s lawyers have complained that the logs don’t provide enough information and requested that the judge resolve the privilege issue ASAP.

On Sunday, Eastman’s lawyers accused the committee’s efforts to clear up the issue of being “motivated” by the upcoming 2022 midterms.

House attorneys and Eastman’s team are scheduled to appear in court on Monday to report their progress on the document exchange.

Read the filing below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. IANAL, but this suggests incriminating evidence in those emails, not someone proudly upholding legal precedent. Just an illegal President. But that’s just me.

  2. A-C privilege will not apply, I can bet. Of course, this is all just delaying the inevitable release.

  3. Actual question:

    How, when, why, and over what subject matter did Eastman and Trump form an attorney-client relationship? So far as I can tell, he’s just a dude with a law degree hanging around a presidential campaign for no particular purpose. Writing a crazy-ass memo as an audition for Attorney General doesn’t make you anyone’s lawyer.

  4. The likes and the “whews” will mount for your post

  5. Avatar for zandru zandru says:

    Hey, emails are only a “thing” when they’re tied to “Crooked Hillary.” That’s just Journo 101.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

157 more replies

Participants

Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for ghost Avatar for deuce Avatar for economides Avatar for becca656 Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for pb Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jinnj Avatar for known_thespian Avatar for rickjones Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for brian512 Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for hahagoodman Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Hatmama

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: