Jeffries Says He Has ‘No Indication’ Cap Police Reviewed Jan. 6 Footage Tucker Carlson Plans To Air

US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during the House Democratic Caucus Issues Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, on March 1, 2023. (Photo by Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REY... US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during the House Democratic Caucus Issues Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, on March 1, 2023. (Photo by Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said he has “no indication” that Capitol Police screened the Jan. 6 footage that Fox News host Tucker Carlson says he is planning to air, casting doubt on House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s (R-CA) statement that all footage will be vetted before being released.

“I have no indication at this moment that the police have vetted that footage,” Jeffries said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “It is my hope and expectation that that will absolutely occur.”

Jeffries’ Sunday remarks come shortly after McCarthy responded to days of staunch criticism from Democrats, telling reporters last week that none of the footage will be released to Carlson’s team or be broadcasted publicly before it is screened by the Capitol Police to make sure it doesn’t compromise the security of the Capitol building. 

Carlson — who spent months airing conspiracy theories about the legitimacy of the 2020 elections and the Capitol attack itself — has what he described on his show as “unfettered,” exclusive access to more than 40,000 hours of unreleased surveillance tape from Jan. 6. And Democrats have been arguing that allowing full access to an outside party like Carlson could create security risks for the Capitol and the people who work there.

Jeffries echoed that sentiment and stressed Sunday the footage “must absolutely be vetted” before it is made public.

“The Jan. 6 insurrection was violent. Approximately 140 officers were seriously injured. A handful of officers died as a result of the events of the Jan. 6 violent insurrection. There are serious security concerns,” Jeffries added. “We’re releasing footage into the public domain in an era where political violence is on the rise, and there are people, including the former president, who fan the flames of extremism.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Jeffries echoed that sentiment and stressed Sunday the footage “must absolutely be vetted” before it is made public.

    Great. How to double the ratings in one easy remark.

  2. Does Jeffries have any influence here? Has he actually asked the Capitol Police if they have seen it?

  3. So many questions!

    Why does the House have seemingly exclusive access?

    If Qevin can give it to Tuckson, why can’t ChuckS give it to Maddow?

    If it is OUR footage, as in WE THE PEOPLE, why can one outlet (don’t you DARE call it a NOOSE outlet) get exclusive access to it?

    Does Putin shit in the woods?

    How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

    Is there no end to the questions?

    Is there more coffee?

  4. Avatar for kovie kovie says:

    Here’s hoping that the house ethics committee looks into this…

  5. Avatar for trnc trnc says:

    Good one!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

60 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for michaelmaiello_aka_destor23 Avatar for slbinva Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for zandru Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for deuce Avatar for trnc Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for pmaurath57 Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for socalista Avatar for plebeian Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for johnsd Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for captainfantastic Avatar for dicktater Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for teewhy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: