Jan. 6 Committee Threatens Criminal Contempt Of Congress Referral After Bannon’s Defiance

Steve Bannon
Former Chief Strategist for US President Donald Trump, Stephen Bannon (Photo by John Lamparski/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A day after Steve Bannon’s lawyer told the House Jan. 6 committee that his client will defy its subpoena, the committee published a bristling statement vowing to consider referring uncooperative witnesses for criminal contempt of Congress.

“While Mr. Meadows and Mr. Patel are, so far, engaging with the Select Committee, Mr. Bannon has indicated that he will try to hide behind vague references to privileges of the former President,” Committee chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and vice chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) said in a statement.

Bannon’s lawyer, Robert Costello, told the committee Thursday that former President Donald Trump had asked advisers to invoke executive immunity in order to avoid handing over documents or giving testimony. 

Bannon, Meadows, Patel and former White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino comprise the committee’s first round of subpoenas. 

Bannon in particular had departed from the White House by 2017, long before January 6 and the events leading up to it, making his claims of executive privilege even more suspect. To hold Bannon or any witness in criminal contempt, the committee would have to hold a vote on a contempt resolution, which would then go to the full House for a vote. 

The committee is seeking to depose all four men next week, which could set up more potential contempt referrals if the deadline is ignored. 

“Though the Select Committee welcomes good-faith engagement with witnesses seeking to cooperate with our investigation, we will not allow any witness to defy a lawful subpoena or attempt to run out the clock, and we will swiftly consider advancing a criminal contempt of Congress referral,” the committee chairs wrote.

Latest News
89
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. a bristling statement vowing to consider referring uncooperative witnesses for criminal contempt of Congress

    Yeah, that should scare him up real good. A vow to consider doing something. Very impressive.

  2. the committee published a bristling statement vowing to consider referring uncooperative witnesses for criminal contempt of Congress

    I think it’s time for more than a sternly worded letter. Just arrest the traitorous bastard

  3. Avatar for nb nb says:

    Threatens ?
    How about do it !

  4. Can we be rid of this cancerous boil already?

  5. Avatar for v12nna v12nna says:

    I say, “Do and don’t talk.”
    on that score, Bill Palmer says:
    Yes, the committee’s press release says that it will “swiftly consider” the criminal referral against Bannon, and yes, a number of media pundits are insisting that this wording means nothing will be done. But they know that’s a bunch of crap. As Palmer Report has pointed out numerous times, phrases like “swiftly consider” are politician-speak for “we have absolutely already decided to do this.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

83 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for voreason Avatar for sniffit Avatar for danny Avatar for tecmage Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for nb Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for pb Avatar for tena Avatar for brewhousebob Avatar for rickjones Avatar for brian512 Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for v12nna Avatar for jm917 Avatar for bcgister Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for m_00_m Avatar for gargoyle

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: