Jan. 6 Committee Members Push Back Against DOJ Request For ‘All’ Interview Records

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 09: (L-R) U.S. Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), Rep. Peter Aguilar (D-CA), Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), and Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Chair of the Select Committee to Invest... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 09: (L-R) U.S. Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-FL), Rep. Peter Aguilar (D-CA), Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), and Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Chair of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol, listen during a hearing held to investigating January 6 on June 09, 2022 in Washington, DC. The bipartisan committee, which has been gathering evidence related to the January 6 attack at the U.S. Capitol for almost a year, will present its findings in a series of televised hearings. On January 6, 2021, supporters of President Donald Trump attacked the U.S. Capitol Building during an attempt to disrupt a congressional vote to confirm the electoral college win for Joe Biden. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS

After the Justice Department pressed the congressional Jan. 6 Committee to provide all of its deposition records for ongoing federal criminal cases, members of the committee said that while they wouldn’t be an obstacle to the DOJ’s work, they also had to focus on their own investigation and wanted federal prosecutors to be more specific in their request. 

“We certainly will help them,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), a member of the committee, said on CNN Sunday. 

But, Schiff added, “We want them to particularize what they’re asking for.” 

The bubbling tension between federal prosecutors and congressional investigators became public record Thursday, when prosecutors disclosed a letter sent the day prior from the DOJ to the committee. The letter was included in a court filing in the criminal prosecution of several members of the Proud Boys charged in the Capitol attack. 

The letter followed up on a request from April, and stated that it was critical that the committee provide “transcripts of all of its witness interviews.” 

“The Select Committee’s failure to grant the Department access to these transcripts complicates the Department’s ability to investigate and prosecute those who engaged in criminal conduct in relation to the January 6 attack on the Capitol,” the Justice Department officials wrote to the committee. 

Several members of the committee have said they’re willing to work with the DOJ, but not by handing everything over to the executive branch. 

“We are not going to stop what we are doing to share the information that we’ve gotten so far with the Department of Justice,” committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) told reporters Thursday. “We have to do our work.”

In his appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday, Schiff pushed back on the idea that the DOJ should expect “all” of the committee’s deposition transcripts, which now number in the hundreds. 

“Congress never says, ‘Hey, Justice Department, other branch of government, just come and go through our files.’ We also don’t say, ‘Hey, we want to go over and just rifle through your files,’” he said.

“When the Justice Department asks for things specifically — ‘Hey, we’re looking at a case, we’re investigating this person, can you give us what you have’ — we work with them. And we will work with them here.” 

Prosecutors, Schiff added, have subpoena power too, and can convene grand juries and bring in witnesses.

“Traditionally, they don’t wait for Congress to do that work for the department,” Schiff said. “So we’re going to work with them. We want them to be successful in bringing people to justice.” 

Other members of the committee have expressed an eagerness to help prosecutors, but noted that the panel staff is currently inundated with work themselves. 

“We were surprised by that, frankly, and we will engage,” Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) said of the recent DOJ letter on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday. 

“We’re not going to be an obstacle to the Department of Justice prosecution of individuals,” she added. “We’re in the middle of putting these hearings together. The staff is working incredibly hard along with the members of Congress. We will get particular information that they need over to them in an orderly way, certainly by the beginning of next month.” 

But a couple days earlier, Lofgren was a bit less diplomatic in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper: “It’s really not the way that DOJ is supposed to work,” she said of the DOJ’s blanket request for transcripts. “What have they been doing over there?” the congresswoman added. 

“We’re certainly going to be engaged with them and provide necessary transcripts and information that might be necessary, but you don’t have the executive branch tromping into the legislative branch and essentially turning our investigation upside down,” Lofgren told Tapper. “That’s not the way things have proceeded. But we will engage with the DOJ. We will provide what’s necessary in an orderly way.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: