DOJ Fight With Jan. 6 Committee Bursts Into The Open

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 13: (L-R) U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) (L), Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol, and Vice Chairwoman Rep. Liz ... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 13: (L-R) U.S. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) (L), Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol, and Vice Chairwoman Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), listen during a hearing on the January 6th investigation in the Cannon House Office Building on June 13, 2022 in Washington, DC. The bipartisan committee, which has been gathering evidence for almost a year related to the January 6 attack at the U.S. Capitol, will present its findings in a series of televised hearings. On January 6, 2021, supporters of former President Donald Trump attacked the U.S. Capitol Building during an attempt to disrupt a congressional vote to confirm the electoral college win for President Joe Biden. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Justice Department on Wednesday requested transcripts of all of the congressional Jan. 6 committee’s depositions, writing in a seemingly frustrated tone that the committee’s “failure” to grant access to the transcripts was complicating the department’s ability to investigate and prosecute those who engaged in criminal conduct related to the insurrection.

“The Select Committee’s failure to grant the Department access to these transcripts complicates the Department’s ability to investigate and prosecute those who engaged in criminal conduct in relation to the January 6 attack on the Capitol,” the letter stated, after noting that the DOJ couldn’t “compel” Congress to provide the transcripts on its own.

The letter became public through the ongoing criminal case against several members of the Proud Boys. Prosecutors attached it to a court filing consenting to the defendants’ request to push the trial date from August until December due to the potential impact of the transcripts. The filing noted that the letter was sent to the committee on Wednesday. 

“It is now readily apparent that the interviews the Select Committee conducted are not just potentially relevant to our overall criminal investigations, but are likely relevant to specific prosecutions that have already commenced,” read the letter, which was signed by the U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., Matthew Graves, and two assistant attorneys general: Kenneth A. Polite, Jr. of the DOJ’s criminal division, and Matt Olsen, the assistant attorney general for national security.

“Given this overlap, it is critical that the Select Committee provide us with copies of the transcripts of all its witness interviews.” 

Wednesday’s letter argued that federal prosecutors needed to be able to compare the deposition material to other material from witnesses “who have provided statements to multiple government entities” in order to assess the strength of that testimony in any potential criminal prosecutions, and to ensure that investigators consider all relevant evidence. 

“We cannot be sure that all relevant evidence has been considered without access to the transcripts that are uniquely within the Select Committee’s possession,” the DOJ officials wrote.

The signatories noted that they were writing “in furtherance of our letter on April 20, 2022.” The existence of that earlier letter seeking transcripts had been reported in May by the New York Times.

‘“Accordingly, we renew our request that the Select Committee provide us with copies of the transcripts of all interviews it has conducted to date.” 

At the time of the Times’ May report, Committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) indicated that he was aware of the request, but did not anticipate sharing the panel’s “work product” before its work was complete.

“We’re in the midst of our work,” Thompson told reporters. “If they want to come and talk, just like we’ve had other agencies to come and talk, we’d be happy to talk to them, but we can’t give them access to our work product at this point.”

“They wanted access to depositions,” he said in May. “But my understanding is they didn’t tell us specifically what transcripts or anything like that. And obviously, we spent quite a bit of time and effort to get where we are. And we’re still in the midst of our own investigation.”

Prosecutors and defense lawyers in the Proud Boys’ case discussed in a hearing last week the timeline under which the committee was likely to make its materials public. At the time, one prosecutor said the feds expected it might not be until September, when they also expected the committee to release a public report.

The filing in the Proud Boys’ criminal case emphasized why the transcripts would be relevant to ongoing cases. It noted to the court: “While we do not know precisely when copies of the transcripts will be released, if they are released as currently anticipated in early September 2022, the parties to this trial will face unique prejudice because the jury for the August 8 trial will have already been sworn and jeopardy will have already attached.”

News of the request broke during a hearing of the committee, and around the same time that The New York Times reported that a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C. had issued subpoenaed to Jan. 6-era Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman and Kenneth Chesebro

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. oh, so now the DOJ is frustrated? I have no idea what’s going on behind the scenes, but at the moment I have to say I have a lot more faith in the J6 panel than the DOJ. If the J6 panel is stalling for some reason I will give them the benefit of the doubt, so far they seem to be making the right decisions. And they postponed the hearing that dealt with the DOJ. Does that have something to do with this? I will stay tuned…

  2. A: DOJ can put a fucking name on this request so when the contents of the transcripts are leaked there is someone responsible for it.

    B: Get a fucking subpoena. You guys over there know how to do that, right? If it’s not worth the effort to get a subpoena, maybe you don’t need the transcripts right now.

  3. The headline aside, it doesn’t sound like much of a fight to me, more like a miscommunication w/ the DOJ realizing its measured, bottom-up approach has put it behind the curve.

  4. Now we know why they know there is a deep state.

    This committee cannot risk allowing anyone to see the information they have. This is a government-wide conspiracy, reaching even the Supreme Court and the Secret Service, as well as a great many other branches of government and the military.

    This is the metaphoric beast, folks. The bared elephant.

Continue the discussion at

114 more replies


Avatar for dalinker Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for drbb Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for trnc Avatar for voreason Avatar for lastroth Avatar for gr Avatar for dryheat Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for isakindamagic Avatar for caltg Avatar for brian512 Avatar for redhand Avatar for donnamugavero Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for glowgirl Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for jimsmith Avatar for senseihollywood Avatar for Paracelsus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: