Iowa And New Hampshire Pledge Not To Cancel Their GOP Caucus, Primary

President Donald J. Trump stops to talk to reporters and members of the media as he walks to Marine One to depart from the White House on Wednesday, Aug 07, 2019. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Two crucial states in the primary process won’t be eliminating their GOP nomination contests.

In a series of Associated Press interviews published on Wednesday, Iowa and New Hampshire’s Republican Party chairmen promised they wouldn’t call off their caucuses and primaries, unlike their counterparts in four other states.

Iowa National Committeeman Steve Scheffler told the AP that upholding the state’s caucuses was “never even up for discussion.”

“We’re not going to shut the door on anyone and say, ‘You’re not welcome,'” he said.

Steve Duprey, GOP national committeeman of New Hampshire, agreed.

“Under no circumstances will the New Hampshire primary ever be canceled, whether there’s token opposition or a serious contest,” Duprey told the AP.

Over the weekend, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona and Kansas’ Republican Parties announced that they wouldn’t hold their primaries or caucuses, effectively protecting President Donald Trump from any Republican challengers.

Trump applauded the four states on Monday for the move, saying that they “don’t want to waste their money” because his GOP rivals are a “total joke.”

“If there was a race, they would certainly want to do that, but [the challengers] are considered to be a laughing stock,” Trump told reporters.

Former congressmen Joe Walsh (R-IL) and Mark Sanford (R-SC), along with former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld (R), have launched primary bids against Trump.

Latest News
26
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I have to admit I’m confused by the states cancelling their primaries. Aren’t there down-ballot races that need to be voted on? If they’re still voting on those, then aren’t they only cancelling the presidential primaries. It may be semantics, but I haven’t seen an article yet that makes it clear.

  2. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    Wouldn’t it be wonderful optics if trump started the official election season by losing within his own party? Even though he would eventually still have the delegates for a coronation, the news value would be delicious.

  3. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    You’d think Little Donnie would relish the opportunity to crush the likes of Joe Walsh and Bill Weld. Instead he’s afraid of them. Not strong!

  4. “Over the weekend, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona and Kansas’ Republican Parties announced that they wouldn’t hold their primaries or caucuses, effectively protecting President Donald Trump from any Republican challengers.”

    Brave, brave Sir Donald.

    Who nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.

    Who nearly stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.

    And who personally wet himself at the Battle of Badon Hill.

    (“He’s buggered off! He’s scarpered!”)

  5. It would make the other states’ cancelling of their primaries look even more like the Republican primary and nomination processes for 2020 are … what’s that word? Oh, yeah - RIGGED!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

20 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for paulw Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for becca656 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for inversion Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for tsp Avatar for wtfinsc Avatar for rickjones Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for erik_t Avatar for dangnewt Avatar for taisie22 Avatar for g_k Avatar for pwmesq Avatar for rucleare Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Bri2k Avatar for RFHCV Avatar for vern58

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: