Insurrection And Threat Of Right-Wing Violence Hang Over First Biden Nominee Hearings

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 19: National Guard patrol the National Mall on January 19, 2021 in Washington, DC. Tight security measures are in place for Inauguration Day due to greater security threats after the attack o... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 19: National Guard patrol the National Mall on January 19, 2021 in Washington, DC. Tight security measures are in place for Inauguration Day due to greater security threats after the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

As the first batch of President-Elect Joe Biden’s nominees faced their confirmation hearings Tuesday, reminders of the recent Capitol invasion and ransacking loom both inside and outside the building. 

And it was clearly on the minds of the nominees and Democratic members, particularly during the hearings for critical national security positions. The nominees for those positions, Alejandro Mayorkas for Department of Homeland Security secretary and Avril Haines for Director of National Intelligence, took on a battery of questions about the growing threat of violent, right-wing groups that have unified to support President Donald Trump. 

“The love for this country that I learned from my parents made the January 6 attack on the Capitol all the more horrifying,” Mayorkas said in his opening statement.

“We still have much to learn about what happened that day and what led up to the insurrection,” he continued. “If I should have the honor of being confirmed, I will do everything I can to ensure that the tragic loss of life, the assault on law enforcement, the desecration of the building that stands as one of the three pillars of our democracy, and the terror felt by you, your colleagues, staff, and everyone present, will not happen again.” 

Concern about the attack, and, more broadly, the rise in domestic terrorism particularly from white supremacists, provided the framework for some Democratic questioning in the DHS hearing. Republican members tended to focus more narrowly on immigration and cybersecurity issues. 

Ranking member Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) said that he’d often been met with “resistance” in his efforts “to investigate white supremacist violence and threats,” asking Maryorkas how he’d retrain the department’s focus. 

“We have seen the disturbing and alarming rise in domestic terrorism throughout the country, culminating of course with the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol 13 days ago,” said Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), pushing a terrorism information-sharing commission. A breakdown in communications — particularly around what the FBI shared or did not share with local police forces in D.C. — has become a point of contention and scrutiny in the reckoning after the insurrection.

Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV) used the invasion to tee up a question about combatting domestic terrorism motivated by anti-Semitism. 

“Just this month, we saw American citizens lay siege to the U.S. Capitol waving Confederate flags, hanging a noose on the west front lawn and wearing ‘Camp Auschwitz’ t-shirts,” she said.

There were similar themes over in the hearing for Director of National Intelligence nominee Avril Haines, despite the fact that the agency is further removed from issues of domestic terrorism. 

Haines called the insurrection “truly disturbing,” though she added that the FBI and DHS are the point organizations to handle U.S.-based threats. 

She also promised a public assessment on the threat from QAnon, a conspiracy theory that has enveloped many of the pro-Trump communities behind the Capitol mob.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the ranking member, made a point of identifying terrorism as a growing threat. He somewhat surprisingly listed Antifa as a “violent extremist group,” given that it’s less of an organization than a philosophy that the Trump administration has sought to demonize.

“Terrorism remains a real and major threat, especially as violent extremist groups whether, Islamist, Antifa, or white nationalism, are increasingly mutating, fracturing, regrouping, and radicalizing on the Internet and social media,” he said.

The heavy presence of the insurrection in the questioning connects to the heightened desire to have leaders of the departments that handle national security confirmed quickly. Currently, as the nominees answer questions, the city they’re in is flooded with National Guard troops and criss-crossed with barricades and fencing. Its entry points are heavily monitored, and much of the public transportation into the city has been stopped. 

On Wednesday, Washington D.C. will host an inauguration already unlike any that’s gone before, simply due to the COVID-19 pandemic. But after January 6, the country — including these lawmakers and nominees — will be holding its breath to see if more pro-Trump violence breaks out.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. I just can’t get over how sad it is to see the Capitol surrounded by fucking razor wire.

  2. I’m glad to see the concern about domestic terrorism being at the forefront of this discussion, but domestic terrorism has been an issue for more than the last six weeks - try the last 20 years. How’s come the focus wasn’t on this then?

    Yes, the DHS must take the lead in this. And while they’re at it, a complete re-organization is in order to re-define the mission of the DHS and get rid of the black ops portion of the program.

  3. Two National Guard troops have been removed from duties related to the inauguration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. following vetting for links to right-wing extremist movements, a Pentagon official said on Tuesday.

    The official declined to provide any details about the vetting that detected the Guard members, who are from two different states.

    The acting defense secretary, Christopher C. Miller, said on Sunday that the F.B.I. was assisting the U.S. military in vetting more than 25,000 National Guard troops being deployed to assist in protecting the Capitol and areas in central Washington for potential security concerns.

  4. Because nothing gets the attention of politicians quite like experiencing the risks that regular folk go through every day.

    If there were no metal detectors in the Capitol, and regular citizens could legally carry their weapons just like they can everywhere else, you can be assured that gun control would have happened eons ago, for example.

  5. I remember reading, the day after the Capitol siege where a kid, on hearing of the subsequent metal detectors, wasn’t at all impressed. He said, we go through these every day just to get to class. What’s the big deal?

    Sad.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

15 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for drriddle Avatar for murgatroid Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for kerf Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock Avatar for old_guru Avatar for HBryan

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: