House Dems Call On Garland To Investigate Thomas For Failing To Report Lavish Gifts

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 26: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks during a House Oversight Committee hearing (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A group of House Democrats led by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Justice Clarence Thomas for failing to report lavish gifts in a Friday afternoon letter. 

“Justice Thomas’s consistent failure to disclose gifts and benefits from industry magnates and wealthy, politically active executives highlights a blatant disregard for judicial ethics as well as apparent legal violations,” they write.

In addition to Ocasio-Cortez, the letter is signed by Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and Hank Johnson (D-GA).

The letter lists many of the trips and treats Thomas has been gifted by the likes of billionaire Harland Crow. 

“All told, Thomas has received at least 38 destination vacations, 26 private jet flights, eight helicopter flights, VIP passes to sporting events, stays at luxury resorts, and an invitation to an exclusive golf club,” they write. “The total value of the undisclosed trips given to Thomas since his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991 is estimated to be several million dollars, according to ProPublica.”

The group points out that violations of the Ethics in Government Act’s disclosure requirements “can carry both civil and criminal legal penalties.”

Thomas’ luxe treatment at the hands of benefactors, some of whom have had business before the Court and many of whom operate in right-wing political and legal circles, has been revealed in a steady drip since ProPublica broke the news of his decades of Crow-sponsored vacations in April. 

Most recently, the outlet compiled a list of the dozens of other billionaire-sponsored luxury vacations he’s taken. 

Justice Samuel Alito, too, has enjoyed high class Alaskan salmon fishing thanks to billionaire Paul Singer, who is a prolific donor to Republican causes and has had business disputes involving his hedge fund before the Court. 

Thomas and Alito have both insisted that they’ve done nothing wrong, and the political right has quickly closed ranks around them. Alito tried to pre-but the article about his escapades in the Wall Street Journal

Some members of Congress, including Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin (D-IL) have made half-hearted gestures at holding the justices accountable. But with a Republican House and Senate filibuster, a bill that would impose a code of ethics on the Supreme Court — one of the least aggressive and most popular forms of Court reform — will almost certainly not become law this term.  

Read the letter here:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. I guess they weren’t going to put up a picture of Jerry Nadler to get our attention.

  2. GOP Justices got secret payoffs.

  3. Shockingly, SCOTUS just squashed the Sacklers’ bankruptcy dodge through Purdue Pharma. I guess they didn’t give enough.

  4. But the plantiffs will have to now wait longer for their payments.

    The Supreme Court on Thursday temporarily blocked a bankruptcy deal for Purdue Pharma that would have shielded members of the billionaire Sackler family, which once controlled the company, from additional civil lawsuits over the opioid epidemic and that capped the Sacklers’ personal liability at $6 billion.

    The order is likely to delay any payments to the thousands of plaintiffs who have sued the Sacklers and Purdue, the maker of the prescription painkiller OxyContin, which is widely blamed for igniting the opioid crisis. Under the deal, the Sacklers had agreed to pay billions to plaintiffs in exchange for full immunity from all civil legal disputes.

    The order was in response to a Justice Department objection to the plan, which the government said allowed members of the Sackler family to take advantage of legal protections meant for debtors in “financial distress,” not for billionaires.

    The justices said they would hear arguments in December to decide whether the agreement is authorized by the U.S. bankruptcy code. The case could have far-reaching implications for similar lawsuits.

    The Sacklers need to suffer personal loss for what they did.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/10/us/supreme-court-purdue-pharma-opioid-settlement.html

  5. Garland would no longer be able to hang with his friends at the Federalist Society if he opened an investigation into Thomas.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

68 more replies

Participants

Avatar for fgs Avatar for thehatter Avatar for losamigos Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for arrendis Avatar for emjayay Avatar for jeffs Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for gr Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for rickjones Avatar for eddycollins Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for iconoclast Avatar for brian512 Avatar for evave2 Avatar for chjim Avatar for iafixture Avatar for timbomov Avatar for CaptainObvious

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: