Vice President Kamala Harris on Wednesday morning slammed GOP lawmakers’ fearmongering over efforts to curb gun violence through reforms on firearm purchases.
During an interview on CBS “This Morning,” Harris asserted that after the series of shootings in the Atlanta area in Georgia and in Boulder, Colorado last week and this week that left 18 people dead, the notion of tighter background checks shouldn’t be a divisive issue.
“I believe it is possible–it has to be possible–that people agree that these slaughters have to stop,” the vice president said.
Harris pushed back against the right-wing narrative of a controlling government that seeks to strip people of their firearms.
“Stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody’s trying to come after your guns,” she said. “That is not what we’re talking about.”
Several GOP lawmakers have been wringing their hands over legislation aiming to expand background checks, particularly in recent days following the shootings.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) told CNN the day after the Boulder attack that those massacres are “used” as “an excuse to further erode Second Amendment rights.”
“I now believe that their ultimate goal is to abolish our rights,” she said.
During the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing on gun violence on Tuesday, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) tried to compare gun control to imaginary laws on impaired driving that ban sober drivers.
“I’m not trying to perfectly equate these two, but we have a lot of drunk drivers in America that kill a lot of people. We ought to combat that too,” he said. “But I think what a lot of people on my side are saying is we ought not to get rid of all the sober drivers.”
(The Louisiana Republican apparently did not take into account the fact that the government does place many restrictions on driving, especially drunk driving.)
On the other hand, a handful of Republicans such as Sens. Pat Toomey (R-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) have expressed support for some form of expansion on background checks, though they’ve rejected the robust measures in the House’s legislation that passed recently.
Disgusting behaviour…as usual…
The Second Amendment clearly states the right to a " well regulated militia " but the " well regulated " aspect always gets skipped over. I would suggest that what is needed is a debate on just what well regulated means. But it would seem on the face of things to include actual regulations…
Even Plastic Man would be jealous of that reach.
" Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) told CNN the day after the Boulder attack that those massacres are “used” as “an excuse to further erode Second Amendment rights.”
“I now believe that their ultimate goal is to abolish our rights,” she said."
So John Kennedy of Louisiana says, “But I think what a lot of people on my side are saying is we ought not to get rid of all the sober drivers.” As VP Harris says, no one is suggesting that, only that we apply equivalent common sense regulations for gun ownership to those associated with driving an automobile. I own multiple handguns and the background check for the last one took 10 minutes. I hardly felt this was a threat to my second amendment rights. I fact, like most responsible gun owners, I want more thorough background checks (personally I would prefer required educations and licensing, but that’s not going to happen any time soon).
Tax ammo at $100 per round. Problem solved.