Grassley Requests Trump Provide Legitimate Reason For Firing Intelligence Watchdog

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) talks with reporters after the Senate Republican Policy luncheon on February 25, 2020. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and seven other senators on both sides of the aisle sent a letter to President Donald Trump on Wednesday asking him to fully explain to Congress why he fired Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, last week.

The other signatories were Sens. Gary Peters (D-MI), Susan Collins (R-ME), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Jon Tester (D-MT), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

The senators pointed out that Trump was legally required to give the Senate and House Intelligence Committees his reasons in detail for firing an inspector general, and that the law mandates he do so 30 days in advance.

However, Trump only told the Senate Intelligence Committee that he no longer had “the fullest confidence” in Atkinson, and the inspector general had already been fired by then.

“Congressional intent is clear that an expression of lost confidence, without further explanation, is not sufficient to fulfill the requirements of the statute,” the senators wrote. “This is in large part because Congress intended that inspectors general only be removed when there is clear evidence of wrongdoing or failure to perform the duties of the office, and not for reasons unrelated to their performance, to help preserve IG independence.”

The lawmakers requested that Trump respond to their request “no later than” Monday on April 13.

“As supporters of the Inspector General community, and as advocates for government transparency and accountability, it is our responsibility to confirm that there are clear, substantial reasons for removal,” they wrote.

Though Grassley often falls in line with Trump and his agenda, the Iowa Republican (who has long worked to protect whistleblowers and those overseeing government accountability) notably pushed back against him several times when the President persistently attempted to unmask the whistleblower who complained about his call with the Ukrainian president.

Trump fired Atkinson on Friday. The next day, he called the inspector general a “disgrace to IGs” and griped about Atkinson passing on the aforementioned whistleblower complaint to his higher-ups.

A few days after his ouster, Atkinson accused Trump of targeting him for handling the complaint impartially.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Old man shouts at clouds.
    -Obligatory

    Susan Collins “concern watch”…also too.

  2. Worlds collide
    Twilight Zone theme commence
    Chuck Grassley sounds like the voice of reason

  3. And if he doesn’t then Grassley will… do nothing about it. Hell, drump could announce he did it for corrupt reasons and Grassley would do nothing.

  4. Avatar for henk henk says:

    You know damn well why he fired him Chuck. Its the same reason he should have been removed when you had the chance. He is a vindictive, corrupt cretin that has no business in the oval office.

  5. Let’s see, the Orange Menace ignores lawfully-issued subpoenas…yet Chuckles, Mittens and Frau Concernbrau thinks he’s going to reply to their “sternly worded letter”?

    Oh, hah…har-dee-har! It is to laugh…

    (h/t Bugs Bunny)

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

131 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for cervantes Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for esva Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for demyankee Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for redhand Avatar for bcgister Avatar for greenman66 Avatar for inthesedays Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for rucleare Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for old_guru

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: