Graham Follows Through On Challenge To Fulton County DA Subpoena

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 26: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) participates in a panel discussion on the economy during the America First Agenda Summit, at the Marriott Marquis hotel on July 26, 2022 in Washington, DC. Former ... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 26: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) participates in a panel discussion on the economy during the America First Agenda Summit, at the Marriott Marquis hotel on July 26, 2022 in Washington, DC. Former U.S. President Donald Trump returns to Washington today to deliver the keynote closing address at the summit. The America First Agenda Summit is put on by the American First Policy Institute, a conservative think-tank founded in 2021 by Brooke Rollins and Larry Kudlow, both former advisors to former President Trump. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) followed through on an agreement he reached with Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis last week. Graham is now seeking to move his challenges to the legality of the subpoena Willis issued in her special grand jury’s investigation to district court in Georgia, Graham’s lawyers said in a court filing on Friday.

In the filing, Graham’s lawyers said he seeks to remove the proceeding from Fulton County Superior Court to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Graham’s lawyers indicated that he accepted service of Willis’ subpoena last Wednesday. The filing said Willis’ subpoena was issued on July 26 and requires Graham’s testimony before the special grand jury on Aug. 23. Graham’s lawyers are asking to expedite consideration of his motion to quash the subpoena now that he has been summoned to testify later this month.

Graham’s lawyers argue that the proceeding is within the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. They said Graham seeks to quash the subpoena because he argues that he has “absolute legislative immunity and privilege” under the Constitution’s speech or debate clause.

“In defense against being forced to testify in front of a state-court investigative body, Senator Graham raises constitutional issues that the Framers thought were ‘indispensably necessary’ to a functioning Republic — namely, that legislators ‘should enjoy the fullest liberty of speech, and that [they] should be protected from the resentment of every one, however powerful, to whom the exercise of that liberty may occasion offense,’” Graham’s lawyers wrote.

Graham’s lawyers also said he asserts the defense of federal sovereign immunity in challenging the subpoena.

“He raises the lack of extraordinary circumstances necessitating the testimony of a high-ranking government official,” Graham’s lawyers wrote. “In cases of this kind, Congress did not leave its Members to litigate federal and constitutional defenses in state court, but instead gave them the right of removal.”

Graham’s filing was signed by Atlanta-based counsel Brian Lea. However, the filing also notes that former Trump White House counsel Don McGahn’s application for pro hac vice in the case is “forthcoming.” McGahn currently works for the law firm Jones Day, and the filing indicates that Robert Luther, who also works for the same firm, is seeking to join the case as well.

The filing by Graham’s lawyers comes a week after the Trump ally reached an agreement with the Fulton County district attorney to move potential disputes to her subpoena to Georgia, following Graham’s previous request that a federal judge in South Carolina quash the subpoena.

Last month, a county judge in Georgia ruled that Graham must testify before the special grand jury in Willis’ investigation into former President Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 election results in Georgia. In addition to Graham, the grand jury subpoenaed several members of Trump’s legal team, who boosted efforts to steal a second term for Trump.

Graham is not the only GOP congressman who was subpoenaed in Willis’ investigation. Last week, a court filing revealed that the Fulton County DA issued a subpoena in June to Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA), who was part of a group of Trump allies who objected to certifying Joe Biden’s electoral victory on Jan. 6. Hice filed a motion to quash the subpoena shortly after receiving the subpoena.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: