Government Employee Union Sues Over Ban On The Word ‘Resistance’

WASHINGTON, USA - JANUARY 25: An anti-Trump sign saying "resist" hung from a construction crane by protestors with the environmentalist group Greenpeace can be seen behind the White House with only four block separat... WASHINGTON, USA - JANUARY 25: An anti-Trump sign saying "resist" hung from a construction crane by protestors with the environmentalist group Greenpeace can be seen behind the White House with only four block separating them in Washington, USA on January 25, 2017. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The American Federation of Government Employees filed a lawsuit against the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday for banning the words “the resistance” and “#resist” when discussing President Donald Trump, as well as any advocacy around impeachment.

The suit focuses on the guidelines the OSC issued on November 30, 2018, which prohibited the use of those words by federal employees in the workplace or while on duty, citing the Hatch Act, a law that bans federal employees from participating in political activity.

According to the OSC, “#resist” and “the resistance” have become “slogans of political parties and partisan political groups, including in their efforts to oppose President Trump’s reelection” and are therefore violations of the Hatch Act. The OSC also concluded that advocacy for or against impeachment of President Trump would violate the Hatch Act.

The AFGE, which represents over 600,000 federal employees, say in the court filings that the OSC “badly misconstrued the text and purposes of the Hatch Act.”

The plaintiffs are seeking an injunction against the office’s “draconian interpretation” of the law “so that federal government employees may fully and freely exercise their First Amendment rights within the bounds of the Hatch Act.”

The AFGE argues that Federal employees are allowed to express opinions about policy issues and elected officials under the First Amendment and are therefore not in violation of the Hatch Act when using the word “resistance.”

AFGE National President J. David Cox Sr. blasted the OSC’s restriction as “one more example of the ways this administration is eroding institutional norms and attacking merit protections for public employees.”

“This suit is about protecting federal employees from political retribution in the workplace,” Cox said in a statement. “OSC’s vague, overbroad guidance creates an opening for managers and political appointees to go after career civil servants for politically-motivated reasons.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Yes, that’s exactly what it’s for. You gotta problem with that?

  2. So POTUS and KAC can openly campaign on the White House grounds, and that’s not a Hatch violation, but rank and file can’t exercise their free speech at lunch? Hmm.

  3. “The OSC also concluded that advocacy for or against impeachment of President Trump would violate the Hatch Act.”

    So when are all the Federal employees in the White House going to be charged under the Hatch Act. Particularly the entire Communications Team and Kellyanne Conway.

  4. Does the Trump administration even dares to invoke the Hatch Act? The courts should require that Kallyanne and others being fired before even mention it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

39 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for epicurus Avatar for cervantes Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for hagarwood Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for schmed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for decay500 Avatar for tena Avatar for southerndem Avatar for tiowally Avatar for capital2 Avatar for john819 Avatar for brian512 Avatar for tpr Avatar for davek319 Avatar for outis Avatar for Paracelsus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: