GOP Senator: It’d Be ‘Extremely Inappropriate’ To Immediately Shoot Down Impeachment In Senate

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 09: Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) speaks about protecting students from sexual preditors during a news conference on Capitol Hill, September 9, 2014 in Washington, DC. Sen Toomey and other members of Congress called on the U.S. Senate to pass H.R.2083, the Protecting Students from Sexual and Violent Predators Act of 2013.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) speaks about protecting students from sexual predators during a news conference on September 9, 2014. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) broke with the GOP senators who’ve already decided against impeaching President Donald Trump, even before the Senate impeachment trial begins, on Sunday.

When NBC News’ “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd asked Toomey if it was appropriate for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to coordinate an anti-impeachment strategy with White House lawyers, the Republican said it’s “appropriate” to make sure Trump “gets a fair trial.”

“And I think that’s the idea,” Toomey said.

“I think it would be extremely inappropriate to put a bullet in this thing immediately when it comes over,” he added. “I think we ought to hear what the House impeachment managers have to say, give the President’s attorneys an opportunity to make their defense, and then make a decision about whether, and to what extent, it would go forward from there.”

Toomey’s position runs in the exact opposite direction of both McConnell and House Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who said he wants to put an end to the impeachment process “as quick as possible.”

“I am trying to give a pretty clear signal I have made up my mind,” Graham said on Saturday. “I’m not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here.”

Watch Toomey below:

Correction: This post originally referred to Toomey as a Republican from Colorado. He represents Pennsylvania. We regret the error. 

Latest News
99
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. That’s barely marginally better than the positions of McConnell and Graham.

    It amounts to: “I’ll listen to what the House managers have to say. And I’ll listen to what the president’s defenders have to say. And then I’ll announce its time to move on. Nothing to see here. No need for witnesses.”

  2. It’s extremely inappropriate for Gaham and McConnell to brag they will not be other than partisan. When they take the oath someone should shout from the gallery
    LIAR!!!

  3. I agree.

    I am more interested in the actual perceived need for this fucker to say anything at all.

  4. Avatar for pine pine says:

    "“I am trying to give a pretty clear signal I have made up my mind,” Graham said on Saturday. “I’m not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here.”

    “He need not have worried. Amidst his boot-licking and willful ignorance of a “quid pro quo,” Graham left little doubt that he had the slightest intention of doing his job as a juror."

  5. Well done, WAPO. The worst coward who wore a uniform I have ever seen in public service.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

93 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sooner Avatar for deuce Avatar for cervantes Avatar for trnc Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for gr Avatar for kitty Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for darrtown Avatar for blaneyboy324 Avatar for tena Avatar for joriep Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for kelaine Avatar for dominic Avatar for zillacop Avatar for heartflow Avatar for progressiveandsane Avatar for dicktater Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for anon84323658

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: