Gay Marriage Bans In South Will Be Heard In Federal Court

In this June 23, 2013 photo, an American flag and a LGBT Rainbow flag are displayed on the ferry dock in the Fire Island community of Cherry Grove, N.Y. The 1969 Stonewall uprising in New York City is generally acce... In this June 23, 2013 photo, an American flag and a LGBT Rainbow flag are displayed on the ferry dock in the Fire Island community of Cherry Grove, N.Y. The 1969 Stonewall uprising in New York City is generally accepted as the Lexington and Concord of the gay rights revolution - the first shots in a battle that eventually led to last week's landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage. But in this seaside resort 60 miles east of Manhattan, reports that homosexuals were standing up for their rights that summer of Woodstock and moon landings was hardly breaking news: a gay community in Cherry Grove had been thriving there for at least two decades before Stonewall. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Bans on gay marriage in three staunchly conservative Southern states were to get a hearing in a federal appeals court Friday — the latest legal battle over an issue expected to be settled by the nation’s highest court.

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was scheduled to hear arguments from state attorneys from Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi — all of which passed bans on same-sex marriages — and from the lawyers arguing against the bans.

The cases represent what could be among the last argued in federal court before the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the issue. The high court on Friday was eyeing the possibility of putting gay marriage on its calendar for this term.

Gay marriage is now legal in 36 states and Washington, D.C., as bans on gay and lesbian marriages have been struck down across the nation.

The appellate court in New Orleans took the highly unusual step of consolidating appeals from the three Southern states into one session, which is expected to last about three hours Friday.

Federal district judges in two of the states struck down gay-marriage bans. In Louisiana last September, however, U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman bucked the trend, marking a rare loss for same-sex marriage supporters after more than 20 consecutive rulings overturning bans in other states. His ruling was the first to uphold a state ban after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in 2013.

“Feldman’s opinion most clearly state’s the opposing view,” said Kenneth Upton, a lawyer for Lambda Legal, a national gay-rights legal organization that will argue on behalf of seven Louisiana gay couples. “In that sense, he’s significant; his decision summarizes the arguments against us.”

Texas voters approved a 2005 state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, but that amendment was declared unconstitutional last February by U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia. He allowed the ban to remain in effect pending appeals.

In Mississippi in November, U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves overturned the state’s definition of marriage as only between a man and a woman. Two lesbian couples and a gay-rights group, Campaign for Southern Equality, sued Mississippi over its anti-gay marriage law and constitutional amendment.

The arguments in the appellate court in New Orleans come on the heels of another defeat in federal court for gay-marriage supporters: In November, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati upheld anti-gay-marriage laws in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.

Conversely, four other appeals courts — in Chicago, Denver, San Francisco and Richmond, Virginia — have ruled in favor of gay and lesbian couples.

With a split among the appellate courts, intervention by the Supreme Court to settle gay marriage constitutionality has become very likely.

Between the appellate rulings and the Supreme Court’s decision in October to turn away state appeals, the number of states allowing same-sex couples to marry has risen to 36.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. It’s going to happen whether you dig in your heels or not, Republicans.

  2. Conservatives’ overweening desire to give their bigotry and hate the force of law will never stop, even after the Supremes rule on the issue—a ruling that is very likely to overturn the remaining unconstitutional anti-equality laws.

    This will play out like the abortion issue has done.
    Conservatives will try anything to thwart marriage equality, because their warped ideology requires a convenient domestic enemy—gay people, women who seek abortions, minorities who seek fair treatment, et al----to keep the conservative base from realizing that its so-called leaders are using the base to gain power while stripping the base of any economic gains or real power.

  3. Oh you Rightie GOPig Cons! You seem unwilling, or perhaps unable, to comprehend the fact that someone else gaining equal rights does not infringe on your rights or take rights away from you. It does, however, make it illegal for loathsome, depraved and hate mongering people like you to enforce your prejudice and hate. Now wasn’t that easy to understand?

    You’re welcome!

  4. Chris Geidner ‏@chrisgeidner

    Judges Higginbotham & Graves are very skeptical of LA’s arguments in defense of the state’s same-sex marriage ban, likely to be struck down.

    Higginbotham, after Smith cited Heller for saying “imperfect fit” is allowed, responded that imperfect fit may be OK, but “no fit” is not.

    [Buzzfeed reporter who is sort of their SSM expert]

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for joepaulson

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: