Trump’s Lawyers Rehash Already-Rejected Arguments In Endless Bid To Dismiss Immunity Case

(COMBO) This combination of pictures created on August 27, 2024 shows Special Counsel Jack Smith (L) in Washington, DC, on June 9, 2023 and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in Ho... (COMBO) This combination of pictures created on August 27, 2024 shows Special Counsel Jack Smith (L) in Washington, DC, on June 9, 2023 and former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in Howell, Michigan, August 20, 2024. On August 27, prosecutors filed a revised indictment of Donald Trump on charges that he tried to overturn the 2020 US election after losing to Joe Biden. The superseding indictment retains the same four charges against Trump but takes into account the recent Supreme Court ruling that a former president has broad immunity from criminal prosecution. (Photo by Mandel NGAN and JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGANJEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Trump’s lawyers late Thursday night — having missed the 5 p.m. deadline set by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan — used a basic procedural step to revive many arguments Chutkan had already rejected, a bid to get the immunity case dismissed or delayed. 

In a filing nominally about telling the judge why Trump’s side is entitled to more discovery from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office, the lawyers went on a stemwinder about the illegitimacy of the prosecution. 

“This case should be dismissed. Promptly,” the lawyers opened. 

They rehashed arguments they’d made to a skeptical, often peeved, Chutkan earlier this month in her Washington D.C. courtroom, that the Special Counsel’s inclusion of evidence related to Trump’s pressuring of former Vice President Mike Pence taints the entire indictment. While the Supreme Court only said that the Pence evidence gets presumptive immunity — putting the onus on the government to overcome it — Trump’s team has reframed that finding in absolute terms, arguing that it voids the whole prosecution. 

“I’m not sure that I agree with you, as a matter of law, that I can dismiss the superseding indictment based on the Supreme Court decision at all,” Chutkan told Trump lawyer John Lauro then.

Still, the Trump team plugged away with the old arguments, bringing up another point that Chutkan has rejected many times: that the proceedings — which the Special Counsel’s office has said includes new evidence its lawyers plan to detail in a filing next week — threaten the integrity of the election. 

“…the Office’s planned filing in defense of the defective Superseding Indictment, before President Trump has had an opportunity to obtain and review all required discovery, will add to ‘the peculiar public opprobrium that attaches to [these] criminal proceedings’ as the election rapidly approaches,” the lawyers wrote, asking for tranches of documents and records from multiple agencies even tangentially connected to the case. 

Chutkan had become exasperated with this argument in early September, saying that she’s not focused on the presidency or the election but the “four-count indictment.” 

After this newest filing, Trump’s team may be in store for further scolding. 

Unless Chutkan accedes to Trump’s demands for delay, Smith’s office is scheduled to submit its opening brief defending the legitimacy of the superseding indictment — complete with the promised new evidence — on Thursday. 

Read the filing here:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. If the Supreme Court is amiss, you must dismiss!

  2. If he’s so innocent, why is he delaying all these cases so much and saying he has immunity? Isn’t asking for immunity an admission of guilt?

    I know, I know, putting any logic behind anything he does is an exercise in futility.

  3. The lesson of this era is if you have enough money you can outrun the law.

  4. Avatar for dave48 dave48 says:

    The bottom line here is that only the voters can save us from Trump. If he loses on November 5, he goes to jail and our national nightmare is over. If he wins, well… I think we all know what that will mean.

  5. Too bad donnie doesn’t pay lawyers outta his own pocket

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

40 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for joelopines Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for blaneyboy324 Avatar for isakindamagic Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for lestat Avatar for tpr Avatar for micande Avatar for tindalos Avatar for davidn Avatar for shemo Avatar for magottlieb Avatar for bcgister Avatar for llwillis Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for thomaspaine Avatar for CaptainObvious Avatar for john_adams Avatar for wyldewest

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: