A panel of three federal judges on Thursday denied Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill (R) and two GOP state lawmakers’ (R) emergency motion to pause the same panel’s order for a new district map that has two majority Black voter districts.
The judges on the panel, which includes two Trump appointees, called the request for a stay “effectively an unsupported motion for reconsideration” of the order, which the court issued in response to two lawsuits over the new Alabama map that allows only one district to have a majority of Black voters.
On Thursday, the judges reiterated their previous finding that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in arguing that the new GOP-drawn map violates Section Two of the Voting Rights Act, which bans racial discrimination in district map drawing.
“This is a straightforward Section Two case, not a legal unicorn,” the court wrote before jabbing at the defendants’ “attention-grabbing but unsupported claims” later in the filing.
Merill and the two lawmakers’ request came after the court found on Monday that the new district map drawn by the GOP-controlled state legislature was racially gerrymandered, and ordered the legislature to create a new map in 14 days that has “two districts in which Black voters either comprise a voting-age majority or something quite close to it.”
Read the filing below:
Wow, a 2/3 Trumpy panel!
Well:
Nice. And the later quotes in the article would seem to indicate that the judges are deciding on the merits.
Yes. To be sure, many of his appointees we’d just as soon not be in these positions, but here and in other instances I can think of, #notallTrumpjudges . . .
“This is a straightforward Section Two case, not a legal unicorn,” the court wrote before jabbing at the defendants’ “attention-grabbing but unsupported claims” later in the filing.
Are federal judges often this sassy?
I’m thinking the Federalist Society has buyer’s remorse with these two judges they purchased. That kind of money was supposed to guarantee certain types of judgements.