DOJ Sues Tennessee For Banning Gender-Affirming Care For Minors

Department of Justice inscription is seen on athe headquarter's building in Washington, D.C., United States on October 20, 2022. (Photo by Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging Tennessee’s recently passed law that bans gender-affirming care for minors, emphasizing it “denies necessary medical care to youth based solely on who they are.”

The DOJ argues that the bill, known as SB 1, violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, discriminating against individuals on the basis of sex and transgender status, according to the complaint. 

“By denying only transgender youth access to these forms of medically necessary care while allowing non-transgender minors access to the same or similar procedures, SB 1 discriminates against transgender youth,” a DOJ press release said.

The Justice Department has asked the court to issue an immediate order to block the Tennessee law from taking effect on July 1.

“No person should be denied access to necessary medical care just because of their transgender status,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “The right to consider your health and medically-approved treatment options with your family and doctors is a right that everyone should have, including transgender children, who are especially vulnerable to serious risks of depression, anxiety and suicide. The Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department will continue to aggressively challenge all forms of discrimination and unlawful barriers faced by the LGBTQI+ community.”

SB 1 — which was signed into law last month by Republican Gov. Bill Lee — prohibits health care providers from prescribing medications, like puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors who identify as transgender or nonbinary, or performing surgeries and medical procedures “if the performance or administration of the procedure is for the purpose of enabling a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex.”

Health care providers who violate the ban could be sued by the state attorney general or private parties, according to the new law.

Lee has already vowed to fight the lawsuit, calling it “federal overreach at its worst.”

In a statement, US Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Henry Leventis said SB 1 violates the constitutional rights of the state’s “most vulnerable victims.”

“Left unchallenged, it would prohibit transgender children from receiving health care that their medical providers and their parents have determined to be medically necessary. In doing so, the law seeks to substitute the judgment of trained medical professionals and parents with that of elected officials and codifies discrimination against children who already face far too many obstacles,” Leventis added.

Last week, three transgender children and their families also sued Tennessee, claiming “the law violates the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause because it allows the banned medical treatments when they are used to treat conditions other than gender dysphoria.” 

Read the DOJ complaint here:

Latest News
36
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Yeah Bubba and so was the Civil Rights Act.

    These people not only seem immune to change but the self-awareness necessary to effect it in the first place.

  2. In a statement, US Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Henry Leventis said SB 1 violates the constitutional rights of the state’s “most vulnerable victims.”

    This ^

    the law seeks to substitute the judgment of trained medical professionals and parents with that of elected officials and codifies discrimination against children who already face far too many obstacles,” Leventis added.

    Elected officials that have no medical training, that use religion as a reason for why care can not be provided. Seems like this could be used to fight abortion bans too.

  3. Where did the small government conservatives go? They are still around - fundamentally, small government conservatives never existed.

    “The harsh reality, however, is that Republicans have historically had no issue embracing big government, so long as it fulfills their political ambitions and ideological preferences.”

    Truth is they never wanted to drown government in the bathtub. They just wanted to drown the majority of voters.

  4. Yes, from the very beginning, no change at all and no surprise.

    Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

    There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

    Frank Wilhoit

    Easy to forget hence worth repeating.

  5. I keep wondering when Tennessee legis-haters will finally get around to relitigating the Scopes Monkey Trial.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

30 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for fess Avatar for fgs Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for dont Avatar for tacoma Avatar for debg Avatar for drriddle Avatar for lastroth Avatar for tao Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for hoagie Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for crewman6 Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for nobiru Avatar for caltg Avatar for tiowally Avatar for socalista Avatar for joce_m Avatar for tindalos Avatar for bcgister

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: