DeVos Proposes More Protections For Students Accused Of Sexual Misconduct

Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos speaks during the fifth meeting of the Federal Commission on School Safety on August 16, 2018. (Photo credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos on Friday proposed a major overhaul to the way colleges and universities handle complaints of sexual misconduct, adding protections for students accused of assault and harassment, and narrowing the types of cases schools would be required to investigate.

Under the plan, schools would be required to investigate complaints only if they occurred on campus or other areas overseen by the school, and only if they were reported to certain campus officials with the authority to take action.

The Education Department says the proposal ensures fairness for students on both sides of accusations, while offering schools greater flexibility to help victims who don’t want to file formal complaints that could trigger an investigation.

“Throughout this process, my focus was, is, and always will be on ensuring that every student can learn in a safe and nurturing environment,” DeVos said in a statement. “That starts with having clear policies and fair processes that every student can rely on. Every survivor of sexual violence must be taken seriously, and every student accused of sexual misconduct must know that guilt is not predetermined.”

DeVos previously said the existing rules were too prescriptive, pressuring schools to take heavy action against students accused of misconduct without giving them a fair chance to defend themselves.

The new proposal adds protections for accused students, giving them a presumption of innocence throughout the disciplinary process and the right to review all evidence a school collects. They would also be able to cross-examine their accusers, although it would be done indirectly through a representative to avoid personal confrontation.

If finalized, it will tell schools how to apply the 1972 law known as Title IX, which forbids discrimination based on sex in schools that receive federal funding.

In September 2017, DeVos rescinded a set of 2011 rules that were created under the Obama administration and guided schools on how to handle complaints.

Advocacy groups for victims say the Obama rules forced schools to stop brushing the issue under the rug, while advocates for accused students say it tipped the scales in favor of accusers. Some college leaders complained that the rules were too complex and could be overly burdensome.

Among other changes, DeVos’s proposal narrows the definition of what constitutes sexual harassment. It would be defined as unwelcome sexual conduct that’s “so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the school’s education program or activity.”

It also allows schools to use a higher standard of proof to determine if a student should be found responsible for misconduct. While the Obama guidance told schools to use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, meaning the allegation is “more likely than not” true, the new proposal would allow a “clear and convincing” standard, meaning the claim is highly probable.

The department will collect public input on the rules before they can be finalized.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. What is a wrong with this wicked chic? Has she been screaming to be raped or sexually assaulted? I don’t understand her sick twisted rationale in making these corrupt rules and policies!
    This bitch must go!

  2. Betsy DeVos: Wealthy, in a position of authority, and stupid. A toxic combination.

  3. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    The plan would narrow the definition of sexual harassment and allow
    students accused of misconduct to cross-examine accusers in campus
    hearings.

    I had to read that twice to believe it.

  4. And when I read that sentence a second time, all I could think was a very sad and long “wow”.

  5. The plan would narrow the definition of sexual harassment and allow students accused of misconduct to cross-examine accusers in campus hearings.

    Rape is a criminal offense. Why the hell aren't women filing charges with the local police department, with the prosecutor tasked with investigating, and cross examinations occuring in the forum of a criminal trial? A defendant wouldn't get to cross examine the accuser, save those that chose to represent themselves at trial I suppose.
    
    I guess I fail to understand how the schools have a choice, or the accused, in what police department takes the lead, or is responsible for, investigating a criminal act. Are college campuses a separate legal zone of responsibility within an area covered by a city, county or state police entity?
    
    Can't a woman say "I don't want the State U police involved with this, I don't trust their judgment, their techniques, and I suspect they're biased and may default to sweeping crimes under the rug to protect the university. I want this looked into by the city police"?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for politicsinpink Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for nickdanger Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for impurescience Avatar for lastroth Avatar for pb Avatar for benthere Avatar for clauscph Avatar for tiowally Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for kelaine Avatar for spacesaver Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: