WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats are planning an extensive review of what went wrong in the 2014 and 2010 elections, hoping to find ways to translate success in presidential campaigns into future midterm contests.
A party committee will conduct a “top-to-bottom assessment” of the Democrats’ performance in recent midterm elections and try to determine why they have struggled to turn out its core voters in nonpresidential elections.
“It’s apparent that there are increasingly two separate electorates: a midterm electorate and a presidential electorate. We win one and we don’t seem to be able to win the other,” said Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who leads the Democratic National Committee, in an interview Saturday. “That is a fundamental dynamic that we have to change.”
Democrats suffered heavy losses in last week’s elections, ceding Senate control to the Republicans and surrendering more seats in the already GOP-majority House as Republicans ran against an unpopular President Barack Obama.
Republicans picked up governor’s offices in a number of Democratic-leaning states like Massachusetts, Maryland and Illinois and strengthened their grip on state legislatures.
Democrats have been successful in turning out an Obama-led coalition of minorities, women and young voters in presidential elections, but have struggled in midterm races when turnout is lower and the electorate tends to be older and whiter, favoring Republicans.
Wasserman Schultz said the new committee, whose membership will be announced in the coming weeks, will look at the party’s tactics, messaging, get-out-the-vote operations and digital efforts in recent nonpresidential elections. The group plans to report back in February at the DNC’s winter meeting.
Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski said last week’s elections underscored GOP momentum.
“When Republicans came to the table and played their game, they lost and that’s a problem,” Kukowski said. “We have said from the beginning that Obama 2012 wasn’t the standard for us. The midterms showed that and we are going to keep building on our successes.”
The DNC’s postelection review has parallels to a postmortem that Republicans conducted after Mitt Romney was defeated by Obama in the 2012 presidential election.
The report urged Republicans to shift its focus to year-round, on-the-ground political organizing in the states and recommended that the GOP embrace a comprehensive immigration overhaul. That recommendation quickly hit resistance from congressional Republicans who rely on primary voters who oppose creating a path to citizenship for immigrants living illegally in the U.S.
“Our party has a problem,” Wasserman Schultz said in a video announcing the project. “We know we’re right on the issues. The American people believe in the causes we’re fighting for. But the electoral success we have when our presidential nominee is able to make a case to the country as a whole, doesn’t translate in other elections. That’s why we lost in 2010, and it’s why we lost on Tuesday.”
Wasserman Schultz said she discussed the need for a review with Obama on election night and both agreed on the need to move forward. She also spoke about her plans Saturday with Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California and Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the party’s leaders in Congress.
“We need to understand everything that went wrong so that we can address all the potential problems and prepare for future elections,” she said.
___
Follow Ken Thomas on Twitter: https://twitter.com/KThomasDC
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Of course, the answer to this ‘soul searching’ from Wasserman and the other DLC/DINO/Repuke-Lite/Clintonesque Triangulators in control of the democratic party will be that “we are not republican enough”.
Simple a five letter word would be very helpful get a S-P-I-N-E .
My President is on Face The Nation with a full interview. He is the best president this country has had since FDR and someday maybe the idiots in this country will realize it even after the fact.
I love you Mr.President
A good start would be getting rid of Wasserman - she’s a walking disaster. And incredibly stupid.
Helllooo! Debbie? Remember the Progressive Democratic base? You know, the ones who have been correct on every issue for the last 50 years, from civil rights, to women’s rights, to anti-war, to pot decriminalization, to gay rights, to anti-government security state, to immigration reform, to environmental protection, to education reform, to health coverage, to Social Security protection, to minimum wage increases…
Why don’t you try pushing hard for some Progressive causes, even before it is politically safe to do so? Maybe you will energize your younger voters who would love to have a real champion for their causes, and nominate some candidates who might not already be bought and sold by big money. Maybe you can get more than 32% of all eligible voters to get out and vote.
Give it a try.