Dem Candidates Angry With DNC Over New Debate Rules That Favor Bloomberg

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 30: Democratic presidential candidate, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg speaks about affordable housing during a campaign event where he received an endorsement from District of C... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 30: Democratic presidential candidate, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg speaks about affordable housing during a campaign event where he received an endorsement from District of Columbia Mayor, Muriel Bowser, on January 30, 2020 in Washington, DC. The first-in-the-nation Iowa caucuses will be held February 3. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Current and former Democratic presidential contenders on Friday criticized the Democratic National Committee for changing debate qualification requirements in a way that favored former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg.

The new debate stage rules, first reported by Politico, eliminate the requirement that candidates achieve a minimum number of donors. That rule applied to the first eight debates of the primary season, including an upcoming debate at St. Anselm College in Manchester, New Hampshire.

Bloomberg, who along with fellow billionaire Tom Steyer has dumped millions of his own dollars into his presidential bid, has not solicited donations for his campaign and fell short of past debates’ donor thresholds.

Now, without a donor floor, polling requirements alone stand between him and the Feb. 19 debate stage in Las Vegas. The DNC’s latest rules, which have gotten tougher with time, require 10% approval in four national polls or 12% in two polls in Nevada and South Carolina — an attainable challenge for Bloomberg.

Or, in place of polling requirements, any candidate who wins at least one national convention delegate during the Iowa or New Hampshire votes will qualify, according to the new rules.

“To now change the rules in the middle of the game to accommodate Mike Bloomberg, who is trying to buy his way into the Democratic nomination, is wrong,” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) senior adviser Jeff Weaver told several outlets.

“That’s the definition of a rigged system.”

In a statement, DNC spokesperson Adrienne Watson defended eliminating the donor threshold, calling it “appropriate for the opening stages of the race, when candidates were building their organizations and there were no metrics available outside of polling to distinguish those making progress from those who weren’t.”

Several current and former candidates felt differently.

Informed of the rule change Friday night, former Vice President Joe Biden said of Bloomberg, “He’s not even on the ballot in Nevada.”

Sen. Corey Booker’s (D-NJ) former campaign manager, Addisu Demissie, tweeted in response to the rule change that among the most significant days on the campaign trail was when the DNC announced a 130,000 donor threshold to qualify for the next debate stage.

“Oh, do you mean the day I literally Control+A+ Deleted a plan for a whole entire early game, early state persuasion strategy and used the money to buy email addresses instead?” former Booker deputy campaign manager Jenna Lowenstein responded. “I don’t remember it. Blacked it out.”

At least one campaign endorsed the change: Bloomberg’s

“We are thrilled that voters could soon have the chance to see Mike Bloomberg on the debate stage, hear his vision for the country, and see why he is the strongest candidate to defeat Donald Trump and bring our country together,” the former New York City mayor’s campaign manager said.

H/t Vox News.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. May the person with the most money win. That’s how it’s supposed to work, right?

  2. I’m starting to find that Bloomberg is a really attractive candidate. I think I like him more than Biden. Bloomberg has unlimited resources and he will spend whatever it takes. The business and financial community is also not afraid of Bloomberg, like they would be Sanders. Moreover, he wants to win. We NEED to win. I think a Bloomberg/Harris ticket would be very strong. Many of us are going to have to put aside a lot of our idealism about our perfect candidate and go with the one who can win.

  3. I have no problem with changing the debate rules.

    So long as the new requirement is that candidates with a net worth of $60 billion be taller than 5’ 8".

  4. Just great. Headlines screaming Democrats in disarray, DNC rigged” etc while trump gloats about hoax witch-hunt impeachment acquittal. Smack my damn head.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

321 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for zoester Avatar for sandyh Avatar for inversion Avatar for arrendis Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for joelopines Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for redemptionsong Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for hahagoodman Avatar for woland66 Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for maximus Avatar for zillacop Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for rockitttla

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: