Federal Judge Tosses Stormy Daniels Defamation Suit Against Trump

Stormy Daniels Signs Copies Of Her New Book "Full Disclosure" at Museum of Sex on October 8, 2018 in New York City.
NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 08: Stormy Daniels Signs Copies Of Her New Book "Full Disclosure" at Museum of Sex on October 8, 2018 in New York City. (Photo by Nicholas Hunt/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge has dismissed porn actress Stormy Daniels’ defamation lawsuit against President Trump, arguing that the President’s comments about Daniels are protected “rhetorical hyperbole” under the First Amendment, The Washington Post reported. 

Trump’s lawyer Charles Harder told the Post the ruling was a “total victory for President Trump and a total defeat for Stormy Daniels.”

Daniels sued Trump for defamation after he publicly suggested she lied about the alleged sexual affair she had with Trump a decade ago.

Her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, who has floated he may run for president in 2020, tweeted that he had appealed the ruling on Monday evening.

The lawsuit tossed by U.S. District Judge S. James Otero in Los Angeles on Monday is just one of Daniels’ legal claims against Trump. She also sued Trump to void the nondisclosure agreement that Michael Cohen — Trump’s former lawyer — arranged for her to sign, alongside a hush payment of $130,000, just before the 2016 election to keep her quiet about the alleged affair.

Trump has also been sued for defamation by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos. She sued Trump after he suggested she was lying about him allegedly sexually assaulting her in 2007.

Latest News
7
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for fgs fgs says:

    It doesn’t even matter what the subject is, It should be clear that the court will be no help whatsoever.

  2. If hyperbole wasn’t protected speech, the president would have no speech at all.

  3. It’s a matter of national security. After all, if Stormy Daniels can sue Trump for defamation based on his tweets, then so can Justin Trudeau, Theresa May, Sadiq Khan, Angela Merkel, and Kim Jong-Un. In fact, about the only people who wouldn’t have a basis for suing him would be Vladimir Putin, Mohammad bin Salman, Boris Johnson, and Nigel Farage.

  4. “Radical hyperbole” is just another term for “exaggerated lies”. One of the criteria for judicial relief in cases of defamation is “actual harm”. Presumably, Stormy has suffered no actual harm because everyone knows Trump lies constantly and no one of any consequence believes anything he says anyway.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

1 more reply

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fgs Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: