Debate Commission Co-Chair Defends Mic Muting Rule: ‘Both Parties Agreed’

US President Donald Trump gestures after the first presidential debate at the Case Western Reserve University and Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio on September 29, 2020. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM W... US President Donald Trump gestures after the first presidential debate at the Case Western Reserve University and Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio on September 29, 2020. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The co-chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates on Tuesday defended the non-partisan organization’s decision to mute microphones during certain portions of the final presidential debate this week, which President Trump has deemed as “very unfair.”

Appearing on MSNBC on Tuesday afternoon, CPD co-chair Frank Fahrenkopf said that the organization made the decision in an effort to enforce rules that both the Trump and Biden campaigns previously agreed to.

On Monday, the CPD announced that it would mute both Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s microphones while their rival delivers initial and uninterrupted two-minute answers on each of the six topic questions at the final presidential debate set to take place in Nashville.

The CPD issued its mic muting decision after Trump’s disastrous debate performance last month. On Sept. 30, the CPD wrote in a statement that the first debate — which was widely panned after Trump hijacked it by frequently interrupting both Biden and moderator Chris Wallace of Fox News — “made clear that additional structure should be added to the format of the remaining debates to ensure a more orderly discussion of the issues.”

Fahrenkopf told MSNBC on Tuesday afternoon that “both parties agreed before the first debate and also agreed again before the second.”

Fahrenkopf then acknowledged that “it’s easy to see those rules were not followed” during the first presidential debate “even though they’d agreed to.”

Fahrenkopf argued that “we didn’t create a rule” by implementing the mic muting measure in the final presidential debate.

“We didn’t touch the rules,” Fahrenkopf said. “All we did is put in a situation where if someone is interrupting, they won’t be allowed to interrupt.”

Fahrenkopf pointed out that once the presidential candidates complete their initial two minutes responding to a debate topic, the mics are on during the rest of the time dedicated to that particular topic, which he hopes will play out with “a little more civility” compared to last month’s presidential debate in Cleveland.

Earlier Tuesday, the CPD refuted the President’s complaint that the nonpartisan organization is enacting “pro-Biden antics” just days before his final presidential debate against Biden. In a scathing letter issued to the CPD on Monday, Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien griped about the absence of foreign policy as one of the six topics selected for the final presidential debate, which were chosen by moderator Kristen Welker of NBC News. Trump has waged attacks against Welker in the days leading up to her moderation duties during the final presidential debate.

Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel apparently launched her crusade against the non-partisan CPD as well on Tuesday as she derided the organization for its decision to mute mics during portions of the debate.

Watch Fahrenkopf’s remarks below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    Look, if Donald doesn’t like it, he doesn’t have to come. Presidenting is hard, and rough! I wonder how fair his buddy Xi feels like being any given day.

    I generally prefer avoiding “manly” as a complement, but by the standards of the term that his own supporters grew up with, he is by a wide margin the least manly man ever to occupy federal office.

  2. Fat Nixon is lucky they even plan to turn his mike on at all.

    A grateful nation would appreciate a duct tape gag on Jabber The Nutt…

  3. His campaign might have agreed, but did Trump agree? Did they even tell him before consenting to this?

  4. Shhhhhh !! They didn’t tell him yet. He will just holler into a muted microphone on Thursday nite and no one will be able to understand what he is talking about…like usual.

    Oh Mango, your days are numbered.

  5. It would be pure Trump to shrug and agree just because he can turn around and whine that it’s SO UNFAIR.

    Well, he is. He acts macho but much of his behavior is really weirdly effete—the falling inflections when he’s tired and talking unguardedly strike me as something no man with any self-awareness would want to sound like. But deeper down there’s nothing very gendered about it, he’s just weak. He’s not disciplined, not resilient, not goal-oriented, not diligent. We’ve had ineffectual presidents, but I can’t imagine any of them were ever quite this bad. It’s hard to imagine an individual outside of an institution who’s quite this bad.

Continue the discussion at

40 more replies


Avatar for discobot Avatar for bdtex Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for zandru Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for pyanfar Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for becca656 Avatar for impurescience Avatar for clearwater Avatar for joelopines Avatar for tao Avatar for dickweed Avatar for benthere Avatar for tena Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for caltg Avatar for brian512 Avatar for spin Avatar for maximus Avatar for erik_t Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: