CNN: Barr Was ‘Intentional’ With ‘Spying’ Comment, Thought It Was Reasonable

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 10: U.S. Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Appropriations Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on April 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. Barr is appearing before t... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 10: U.S. Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Appropriations Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on April 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. Barr is appearing before the Senate committee one day after testifying to the House where he faced many questions about the Mueller report. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Attorney General William Barr was “intentional” when he said Wednesday that he believed “spying” had occurred against the 2016 Trump campaign, even though he later admitted he had no evidence for the claim, CNN’s Laura Jarrett reported on air Thursday, citing “a person familiar with Barr’s thinking,” and “talks that Barr is having with his advisers.”

“This was not a gaffe,” Jarrett reported on-air, citing her source. “He knows what he’s saying, he is quite savvy. He’s very well aware of his words and how they have meaning. So this was intentional, he meant what he said.”

At the same time, Jarrett reported, “he doesn’t view the word ‘spying’ in a derogatory sense. He actually thinks that it’s a perfectly reasonable thing if it’s adequately predicated.”

“And so that’s what he was trying to say when he further explained at the hearing yesterday that what he’s really worried about is unauthorized surveillance.”

While the attorney general said at first during the hearing that “I did think spying did occur” — a gift for conspiratorially minded Trump supporters — he later said that he had “no specific evidence” for the claim.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: