Clyburn Warns Manchin, Sinema Against ‘Catastrophic’ Filibuster Denying Voting Rights

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 01: U.S. House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee Chairman James E. Clyburn (D-SC) speaks at hearing in which U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified on the federal response to the... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 01: U.S. House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee Chairman James E. Clyburn (D-SC) speaks at hearing in which U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified on the federal response to the coronavirus crisis on Capitol Hill September 1, 2020 in Washington, DC. Mnuchin told lawmakers a bipartisan agreement should be reached on funding for schools, testing, vaccines, child care and other priorities. (Photo by Graeme Jennings-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) warned Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) against the “catastrophic” move of letting the filibuster stand in the way of passing The For the People Act, known as HR1, that would expand voting access, especially in communities most affected by the voting restrictions being pushed by Republicans in many states.

“There’s no way under the sun that in 2021 that we are going to allow the filibuster to be used to deny voting rights. That just ain’t gonna happen. That would be catastrophic,” Clyburn said in an interview published in The Guardian on Sunday, days after the House passed HR1.

Clyburn went on to call out Manchin and Sinema. Both of the centrist Democratic senators have faced criticism from those in their party over their opposition to eliminating the filibuster.

“If Manchin and Sinema enjoy being in the majority, they had better figure out a way to get around the filibuster when it comes to voting and civil rights,” Clyburn said.

After stating that he is not necessarily advocating for the elimination of the filibuster, Clyburn added that the Democratic Party “would do well to develop a Manchin-Sinema rule” when it comes to getting around the filibuster regarding issues on race and civil rights.

HR1, which includes provisions such as making Election Day a federal holiday and requiring states to provide at least 15 days of early voting, was passed by the House last week. Along with other Republicans, former Vice President Mike Pence decried HR1 as “unconstitutional, reckless, and anti-democratic” while pushing the bogus election fraud claims that former President Trump continues to peddle.

Although Manchin on Sunday maintained that he won’t change his mind when it comes to his opposition against getting rid of the filibuster, he expressed that he is open to making it “a little bit more painful” to use.

“Make him stand there and talk,” Manchin said on MSNBC’s “Meet the Press.” “I’m willing to look at any way we can. But I’m not willing to take away the involvement of the minority.”

Manchin appeared to float the idea of bringing back something like the “talking filibuster,” where a member of the minority would have to take the Senate floor and speak at length in order to block a vote. Manchin seemed to lean into a framing that some Democratic activists have suggested for centrist Democrats — conveying that reforms to the filibuster are necessary to “save” it, rather than eliminating it.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for tao tao says:

    Huh. Voting rights favor Democratic Senators from red states. Filibuster support only favors Republicans now and forever, and it ought to be done away with. Manchin and Sinema can earn a few bargaining chips here to make their futures a little bit less painful.

  2. Avatar for rhea rhea says:

    I also like the idea of requiring a 40 person block to even START a filibuster. $0 people have to stand in front of a camera and state they are behind the filibuster. Having one person stop the works is wrong.

  3. Could be the tipping point. Explicitly linking HR1 to the underlying racial issues it’s addressing.

    Make a lot of Karens who might be on the fence about it generally to come over to the other side.

  4. The way the filibuster process operates now requires no effort and no penalty from the party that opposes any bill. The anonymous blocking of any legislation must end, preferably with the nihilists forced to stand up and out themselves as such. @rhea I agree. Make it painful for them to deny voting rights, economic relief, and a living wage. In other words, make it painful for them to announce their opposition to popular policies.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

167 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for cervantes Avatar for krusher Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ottnott Avatar for careysub Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for brewhousebob Avatar for kimaanderson Avatar for eddycollins Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for brian512 Avatar for maximus Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for dominic Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: