CNN: Even Barr Is Warning Trump Against SCOTUS Case That Would Nuke Obamacare

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 13: U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks arrives for a press conference on the shooting at the Pensacola naval base January 13, 2020 in Washington, DC. Barr said the Justice Department... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 13: U.S. Attorney General William Barr speaks arrives for a press conference on the shooting at the Pensacola naval base January 13, 2020 in Washington, DC. Barr said the Justice Department’s investigation determined the shooting "was an act of terrorism" that was "motivated by jihadist ideology". (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The longstanding internal Trump administration battle over tearing down Obamacare has come to a head again.

Attorney General Bill Barr, in a White House meeting Monday, renewed his push for the White House to back off from its aggressive anti-Obamacare stance in a pending Supreme Court case, CNN reported.

The deadline is in the coming days for any changes to the administration’s position in the case.

Barr reportedly argued to White House aides that the Justice Department’s current posture — asking the Supreme Court to fully dismantle the health care law — was politically risky in an election season, particularly as the coronavirus outbreak rages throughout the United States.

The Supreme Court is slated to hear the case in its next term, which begins in October.

Already, the Justice Department’s handling of the case was departure from the norm. The Department has not only refused to defend the law, but has adopted a stance opposed even by some of the administration’s congressional allies.

The way that politics apparently has dominated the administration’s litigative decisions has fueled criticisms of the Justice Department under President Trump.

Currently, the administration is backing the argument of several red states, led by Texas, that claim that changes to the law passed in the 2017 GOP tax bill make the entire Affordable Care Act unconstitutional.

Even congressional Republicans who supported the tax measure have pushed back on the administration’s current arguments.

When the Trump administration, under then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions, first indicated it would not be defending the law, its arguments against it were less far reaching than they are now. The administration initially supported the invalidation of the protections for pre-existing conditions and other Obamacare provisions closely tied to the individual mandate, which was zeroed out in the 2017 tax bill.

In 2019, in a move that reportedly pit then White House chief-of-staff Mick Mulvaney against Barr and Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, the administration expanded its opposition in the lawsuit. (Mulvaney supported the more aggressive stance, Azar and Barr reportedly did not.) Now, if the Trump administration gets its way, the entire law, including its Medicaid expansion, could be knocked out by the Supreme Court.

In previous White House debates over the case, Barr has reportedly pointed to the skepticism even among conservative legal experts that the Supreme Court would actually blow up Obamacare now, after refusing to do so in the face of two other major legal attacks that were far less flimsy than the current one.

But even if the justices uphold the law yet again, the Court’s decision won’t likely come until after the election. Democrats have made clear they intend to focus on the efforts by the administration to take down the law — a message that served Democrats well in their 2018 midterm sweep.

The Justice Department declined to comment in the CNN report and a Department spokesperson did not respond to TPM’s inquiry.

Vice President Mike Pence, White House counsel Pat Cipollone, press secretary Kayleigh McEnany and members of the Domestic Policy Council were among those to whom Barr made his case Monday, according to CNN. No final decision was made on changing the administration’s position, CNN said.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for dv01 dv01 says:

    So glad to see the AG is now one of Trump’s chief political advisors. Exactly what the Founders intended I’m sure.

  2. Barr favors the case. He changed the Department’s position to argue in favor of dismantling Obamacare. If they want to back off now b/c the corona virus has made it more politically sensitive, that’s a political decision, not a legal one. Such a decision would not come from AG Barr.

    As it stands, it appears that there are many who will lose health insurance and be unable to enroll in O-Care b/c HHS (and probably Seema Verma) have not allowed enrollment flexibility nor have addressed any creative ways for the insurance companies to shoulder that cost (though the ins co’s recent win on risk corridors could make them flush with cash to shoulder such coverage). Health care is going to be a winning issue for Dems regardless of what AG Barr does. The only thing a court repeal will do is enable President Biden to simply allow uninsured folks to enroll in medicare directly by executive order.

  3. Coming 2021.

    COVID-19 = Preexisting condition. No insurance for you!

  4. ‘Wait, wait Mr. President. I’ll help you fk over Americans later. Let’s wait until the pandemic calms down…’

  5. The optics this summer are going to be great for trump.

    Millions of newly unemployed having lost their employer-based healthcare coverage unable to afford the marketplace rates, and then tens or hundreds of thousands of them getting walloped with hospital bills running in the tens of thousands of dollars for Covid-19…

Continue the discussion at

131 more replies


Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for trnc Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for yskov Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for esva Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for greysea Avatar for kelaine Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for BCSAttorney

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: