Barr Bends Over Backward To Defend Trump Over His ‘Flipping’ Remarks

Attorney General William Barr had a longwinded and convoluted defense of President Trump Wednesday against obstruction claims related to his public attacks on Michael Cohen’s family and his praise for Paul Manafort for “refusing to break.”

In response to questions from Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Barr bear hugged Trump’s incorrect definition of “flipping” and suggested that if Trump believes it means “succumbing to pressure” and lying, he didn’t obstruct justice.

“That is not obstruction because the President’s — the evidence, I think what the President’s lawyers would say, if this were ever actually joined, is that the President’s statements about flipping are quite clear and express and uniformly the same, which is by flipping he meant succumbing to pressure on unrelated cases to lie and compose in order to get lenient treatment. That is not — it’s a discouraging flipping in that sense, it’s not obstruction.”

After Cohen agreed to cooperate with the government in exchange for a lighter sentence for committing several types of financial crimes, Trump immediately began bashing his former lawyer and fixer on Twitter. The most notable attacks centered on suggestions that Cohen’s father-in-law had committed crimes.

“Do you consider that evidence to be an attempt to convince a witness to change testimony?” Klobuchar (D-MN) asked.

“No, I don’t think that could pass muster, those public statements he was making could pass muster as subornation of proof,” Barr said.

Trump’s personal lawyers also privately told Manafort during the investigation that he would be “taken care of,” according to Mueller’s report. In public Trump also called Manafort brave for “refusing to break.”

Barr said all three instances would not be “sufficient to establish” any of the three elements needed to prove obstruction.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: