Houston Voters Reject LGBT Anti-Discrimination Rule After Heated Battle

Houston Mayor Annise Parker speaks to supporters of the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance at a watch party Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015, in Houston. The ordinance that would have established nondiscrimination protections for g... Houston Mayor Annise Parker speaks to supporters of the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance at a watch party Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015, in Houston. The ordinance that would have established nondiscrimination protections for gay and transgender people in Houston did not pass. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

HOUSTON (AP) — Houston Mayor Annise Parker has rallied supporters of a defeated ordinance that would have established nondiscrimination protections for gay and transgender people in the city, telling them the fight isn’t over.

The Houston Equal Rights Ordinance was soundly rejected Tuesday by a vote of 61 percent to 39 percent, following a nearly 18-month battle in the nation’s fourth-largest city that spawned rallies, legal fights and accusations of religious intolerance and demonization of the LGBT community.

But Parker, who is gay and championed the ordinance, led a crowd of more than 100 people at an election night watch party in downtown Houston in a chant that referenced the ordinance’s nickname, HERO, yelling, “A hero fights for justice.”

“I guarantee that justice in Houston will prevail. This ordinance, you have not seen the last of. We’re united. We will prevail,” Parker said.

Still, the future of the ordinance looked uncertain. Parker is finishing her final two-year term, and it’s unclear if the next mayor and city council will revisit the issue.

The ordinance would have applied to businesses that serve the public, such as restaurants and hotels, private employers, housing, city employment and city contracting. It would have allowed residents to file a complaint if they felt they had been discriminated against based on protected categories. Religious institutions would have been exempt. Violators would have faced fines up to $5,000.

Supporters said it would have offered increased protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, and would have protected against discrimination based on sex, race, age, religion and other categories.

Opponents, including a coalition of conservative pastors, said it infringed on their religious beliefs regarding homosexuality. But in the months leading up to Tuesday’s vote, opponents focused their campaign on one part of the ordinance related to the use of public bathrooms by transgender men and women that opponents alleged would allow sexual predators to use women’s restrooms.

Parker, a Democrat, and other supporters described the “bathroom ordinance” campaign as “fear mongering.”

The state’s top two elected leaders — Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, both Republicans — praised the defeat, with Abbott saying voters “showed values still matter.”

Patrick, who vaulted to power on the basis of an ardent tea party following, described the ordinance as “pandering to political correctness.” He said it was only about allowing men to enter women’s restrooms and locker rooms “defying,” in his words, “common sense and common decency.”

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a conservative political advocacy group, said in a statement that Tuesday’s defeat of the ordinance made Houston “a rallying cry for Americans tired of seeing their freedoms trampled in a politically correct stampede to redefine marriage and sexuality.”

The ordinance was initially approved by the Houston City Council in May 2014, but a lawsuit to have residents vote on the measure eventually made it to the Texas Supreme Court, which in July ordered the city to either repeal the ordinance or put it on the ballot.

Tuesday’s referendum drew attention from around the nation, with the measure getting high-profile endorsements last week from the White House, high-tech giant Apple and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. It also received support from other members of Houston’s religious community.

Kristen Capps, a Houston attorney who supported the ordinance, remained optimistic.

“It’s just like every civil rights movement. We’re just going to keep on doing it until it’s done,” she said.

___

Follow Juan A. Lozano on Twitter at www.twitter.com/juanlozano70 .

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Ap photo: Houston Mayor Annise Parker

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. What brings a WTF factor to the HERO defeat is that in the same election, 56% of voters in the mayor’s race voted for liberal candidates (Sylvester Turner, Adrian Garcia & Chris Bell.)

  2. This indicates we have a LOT of work to do, continued outreach and education. I am not familiar with Houston candidates – did those three also show strong public support for HERO? If so, then my first sentence maybe a little too weak.

  3. Avatar for chammy chammy says:

    Yes, there is and it isn’t going to happen overnight. The anti’s apparently mounted a good campaign to defeat it, something democrats still don’t seem to have learned to do to win

  4. Unfortunately, the RWNJs are extremely good with scare tactics. With issues and subjects such as legal rights for trans people–a very new one almost everywhere on the national stage–there is always a learning curve.

    Heck, back in the very early '90s, when I was a young dude living in San Francisco, The City’s electorate was having issues and doubts with allowing gay couples to register (register only–no benefits) as Domestic Partners down at City Hall. It passed, but not by great margins. Later, slowly, benefits such as hospital visitation, inheritance, etc., were added. It isn’t fair and it isn’t right but equality always takes time.

  5. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    “a rallying cry for Americans tired of seeing their freedoms trampled in
    a politically correct stampede to redefine marriage and sexuality.”

    What? I was supposed to stampede? Did I miss the update to our super secret gay agenda? —sigh— I guess I shouldn’t have been giving out lesbian candy (insert scream sound FX) on Halloween either. Yes…I DID IT and I’m not ashamed!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for rfscalf Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for chammy Avatar for strangefriend Avatar for beattycat

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: