S.C. Attorney General Threatens To Sue Obama Over Nuke Fuel Plant (Again)

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson listens during proceedings in the South Carolina Supreme Court Tuesday, June 24, 2014, in Columbia, S.C. Wilson is appealing a judge's ruling that a legislative panel must ... South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson listens during proceedings in the South Carolina Supreme Court Tuesday, June 24, 2014, in Columbia, S.C. Wilson is appealing a judge's ruling that a legislative panel must first sign off before he pursues charges against Speaker Bobby Harrell. (AP Photo/ Richard Shiro) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — South Carolina’s top prosecutor is warning the Obama administration that he’s prepared to sue — again — if a nuclear fuel processing project isn’t made a priority.

Attorney General Alan Wilson said in a letter this month to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz that they should discuss a path that preserves the mixed-oxide project and “avoids litigation.”

The Savannah River Site project is part of an agreement with Russia to turn weapons-grade plutonium into commercial reactor fuel.

South Carolina sued last year after the administration said it wanted to shutter the project, citing billions in cost overruns and project delays. The suit was dropped when the administration agreed to temporary funding.

The overruns and delays have led the administration to slash funding and propose shutting down construction to search for cheaper alternatives.

___

Kinnard can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. “the administration said it wanted to shutter the project, citing billions in cost overruns and project delays.”

    The days of the Rethuglicans calling themselves “fiscal conservatives” is over…

  2. Um, standing? Supremacy?

    Can a state sue the Federal Government whenever the Feds decide to shift spending from one place to another, on the grounds that the reallocation of funds hurts the “losing” state? Really?

  3. over??? when did it even begin??

  4. so the waste of millions of dollars isn’t something the ag is to concerned with huh??/ I wonder whats in it for him …??? how much does he stand to make off this deal…on the side that is

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dwward Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for ottnott Avatar for Talibaptist Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for ljb860

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: