Right-Wing Judges Mulling Restricting Abortion Drug: Isn’t The Real Problem Here How Mean You All Were To Kacsmaryk?

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. TPM Illustration/Senate Judiciary Committee
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A panel of 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges — all Republican appointees — unapologetically carried water for the anti-abortion litigants Wednesday during oral arguments in a case where those litigants are trying to get an abortion pill, mifepristone, yanked from the market. 

“When we celebrated Mother’s Day, did we celebrate an illness?” Judge James Ho, a Donald Trump appointee, snarked, regurgitating a false argument by the anti-abortion doctor plaintiffs that the Food and Drug Administration classified pregnancy as an illness to rush mifepristone through the approval process. 

But perhaps the comedic peak of the arguments came when George W. Bush appointee Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod took time out to scold the lawyer for Danco, a manufacturer of mifepristone, for criticizing Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, the anti-abortion district court judge that handed down the first ruling in the case. Kacsmaryk’s ruling has been widely panned, including by his fellow judges, as the latest in a series of nakedly partisan decisions. 

“Your filings have been excellent, however I am concerned about some rather unusual remarks in the filings — these are remarks we don’t normally see in briefing from very esteemed counsel that talk about the district court,” Elrod said, affecting a dramatic tone to read phrases including that the district court “defied long-standing precedent” and that the court’s injunction was “an unprecedented judicial assault.”  

“I’m wondering if you would have had more time and not been under a rush and probably exhausted from this whole process, would those have been statements that would have been included in your brief?” she asked. 

When Danco’s lawyer pushed back, saying that the language reflected the unprecedented nature of the case, Elrod took an incredulous tone: “So you think it’s appropriate to attack the district court personally in the case in that way.” Ho soon jumped in to continue the beratement.  

The three-judge panel, rounded out by Trump appointee Judge Cory Wilson, left little mystery as to how it will ultimately rule. The judges asked questions premised on the myth that mifepristone is sending floods of women to the emergency room, prompting the Department of Justice lawyer to frequently remind the judges that the drug is incredibly safe. Ho railed against the FDA, listing a series of supposed errors it made unrelated to the abortion case, seemingly to make the case that judges should overturn its experts’ decisions. 

Elrod grilled the lawyer for Danco, pushing for her to provide justification for how the company would suffer any injury if the court restricts its primary product — after she and her colleagues fought tooth and nail to show that the anti-abortion doctors, who have struggled to show any direct injury from the mifepristone regime, have standing to bring the case in the first place. 

Elrod also, while asking how information about adverse reactions to mifepristone are collected, asked how it’s gathered from emergency rooms — “or, God forbid, the morgue.”

Ho also brought up Justice Samuel Alito’s furious dissent, when he asked whether the government would even heed court decisions in this case. Some Democrats have called on the Biden administration to leave mifepristone on the market no matter what happens, citing the right-wing judge shopping in the case. The White House has told TPM that it will not “ignore” the court decisions, but didn’t clarify how the FDA would act, should it lose at the Supreme Court. 

The Fifth Circuit’s attitude was predictable to the anti-abortion litigants too. It’s why they placed this case with Kacsmaryk in Texas, knowing that there’s a very good chance that they’d get a right-wing panel when the case got appealed to the Fifth Circuit. 

The case will almost certainly head to the Supreme Court after the Fifth Circuit rules. Until then, the high court’s administrative stay blocking the lower court rulings — which would have reimposed onerous restrictions on the drug — will remain in place, and mifepristone will be accessible as usual. 

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for daled daled says:

    They just don’t even pretend to care about the law or precedent any more at all…

  2. Avatar for jrw jrw says:

    Did the judges accuse anyone of being a witch?

  3. “Isn’t The Real Problem Here How Mean You All Were To Kacsmaryk?”

    Is there anything more fragile than a Republican in 2023?

    (These delicate daisies are more fragile than that special Miracle Whip soufflé that Paula Deen whipped up to celebrate Nathan Bedford Forrest’s birthday.)

  4. Avatar for kovie kovie says:

    No bigger p word than your average “conservative”.

    And by p word I obviously mean pantywaist, duh. Oh, you mean that other p word? Sure, works as well, pudknocker. Or putz.

  5. When Danco’s lawyer pushed back, saying that the language reflected the unprecedented nature of the case, Elrod took an incredulous tone: “So you think it’s appropriate to attack the district court personally in the case in that way.” Ho soon jumped in to continue the beratement.

    That a judge should considerate it appropriate to address a lawyer in such supercilious tones speaks to the imperial judiciary that our right wing brethren have foisted upon us.

    I worry.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

154 more replies


Avatar for dave_adams Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for inversion Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for sniffit Avatar for tacoma Avatar for debg Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for mrf Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for isakindamagic Avatar for nobiru Avatar for brian512 Avatar for udubtec Avatar for godwit Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for kovie Avatar for ClutchCargo Avatar for xcopy Avatar for john_adams

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: