Treasury Misses Ways And Means’s Final Deadline To Produce Trump Taxes

UNITED STATES - APRIL 4: Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., talks with reporters in the Capitol before entering the office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in the Capitol on Thursday, April 4, 2019. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - APRIL 4: Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., talks with reporters in the Capitol before entering the office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in the Capitol on Thursday, April 4, 2019. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Trump Administration on Tuesday apparently missed a final 5 p.m. deadline from the House Ways and Means committee to hand over six years of the president’s personal and business tax returns — a move Congress said would be interpreted as a “denial” of their request.

The refusal sets the stage for Ways and Means chair Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) to subpoena the documents, igniting a potential court battle over accessing the information.

Neal first requested the returns on April 3 in a letter tailored to prevail in the case of an expected legal challenge.

Since then, the demand has devolved into a dance between House Democrats and the Trump Administration over who will respond to the request. If the Treasury continues to ignore Neal’s requests, the House is expected to sue to obtain the documents.

“To date, the IRS has failed to provide the requested return and return information despite an unambiguous legal obligation to do so,” Neal wrote in an April 13 letter setting the second deadline, issued after Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin stalled on replying to Neal’s first request.

Neal is seeking tax information for eight of Trump’s businesses and for Trump himself. The request goes beyond the president’s returns, and encompasses the IRS’ work materials surrounding its processing of Trump’s taxes.

Experts told TPM that the IRS work materials could prove to be the most valuable portion of the request, while the personal returns themselves are unlikely to contain any smoking guns.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Since the law is so clear, do they need to deal with a subpoena or can they go straight to contempt?

  2. Next obstruction item for the impeachment agenda.

  3. I imagine later today John Koskinen, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Steven Mnuchin, Sec. of Treasury, will be eating dinner in their homes or in fine restaurants despite flagrantly breaking the law by defying Congress’ demand for Trump’s tax returns.

    Meanwhile, Chelsea Manning will remain in prison indefinitely for refusing to testify in front of a Grand Jury investigating Wikileaks.

    Such is American Justice.

  4. IANAL obviously, so why a need for a subpoena. They broke the law, did not deliver, so can’t they request an AUSA or someone move to indict?

    Panda Barr couldn’t be expected to do shit about it, since he’s the president’s Roy Cohn.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

51 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for robg Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for tomdibble Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for reggid Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for georgeh Avatar for jtx Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for noonm Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for maximus Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for jhow144 Avatar for dominic Avatar for atldrew Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: