Mnuchin Declines To Meet Deadline On Trump Tax Return Request

US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin delivers a speech during the G20 meeting of Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, in Buenos Aires, on March 20, 2018. Mnuchin said the United States is not seeking a trad... US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin delivers a speech during the G20 meeting of Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, in Buenos Aires, on March 20, 2018. Mnuchin said the United States is not seeking a trade war over tariffs but does not fear one. The United States and China -- whose differences are fueling fears of a trade war -- are flexing their muscles at the start of a G20 meeting of finance ministers expected to focus on tariffs, tech and taxes. / AFP PHOTO / Juan MABROMATA (Photo credit should read JUAN MABROMATA/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Trump administration will not meet an April 10 deadline issued by the House Ways and Means committee for President Trump’s tax returns, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin wrote in a letter to Congress Wednesday.

“The committee requests the materials by April 10, but the Treasury Department will not be able to complete its review of your request by that date,” Mnuchin wrote.

“The committee’s request raises serious issues concerning the constitutional scope of Congressional investigative authority, the legitimacy of the asserted legislative purpose, and the constitutional rights of American citizens,” Mnuchin added in the letter. A refusal will likely set the stage for a court battle over the House’s request.

The response came after Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA), the Ways and Means Committee chair, sent a request for six years of Trump’s business and personal tax returns — as well as IRS processing information — on April 3.

Neal had faced mounting pressure from liberal members of his committee and from activist groups demanding that he issue the request, made under a 1924 law that empowers the heads of three congressional committees to request the returns of any filer.

The Ways and Means chair — known for a cautious temperament — tailored the letter for review by a judge during litigation that would follow the Trump administration’s anticipated refusal, saying that the House needs the president’s tax information — and the IRS’s information on its processing of the president’s taxes — to determine if he is being given an undue advantage thanks to his office.

In the letter, Mnuchin references Neal’s preparation for the request, writing that “you too have acknowledged the unprecedented nature of the request.”

The Treasury secretary adds that “given the seriousness of the issues, which bear no connection to ordinary tax administration, we have begun consultations with the Department of Justice to ensure that our response is fully consistent with the law and the Constitution.”

Mnuchin concludes the letter by saying that he will oversee the request moving forward, citing “taxpayer protections” as an animating concern.

In the days leading up to Wednesday’s response, both Mnuchin and IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig gave nonspecific accounts during testimony before the House and the Senate about who would reply to Neal.

“It is my responsibility to supervise the [IRS] commissioner,” Mnuchin said on April 9 in testimony before a House Appropriations subcommittee.

“The decision is mine, with the supervision of the Treasury,” said a nervous Rettig on the same day as Mnuchin, before the same House subcommittee.

Latest Muckraker
165
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for outis outis says:

    They are going to fight all of our efforts to restore sanity until we throw them out of office in 2020.

  2. I am sure that this is not a surprise and that the Chair is ready to make his next move.

    It’s on!

  3. Seems Pelosi is going to need to beef up the Sergeant at Arms’ office to, oh, maybe 500,000 officers for enforcement.

    This is just a blatant “Fuck You” to the Rule of Law.

    Not even a refusal to provide the stuff, but a ‘we’ll take it under review’.

    Oh, how I hope that the God they claim to believe in does exist and is a Just one.

  4. *assuming they accept the results of the election and don’t attempt to invalidate the results and call for a do-over.

  5. [quote=“castor_troy, post:5, topic:86676”]
    assuming they accept the results of the election and don’t attempt to invalidate the results and call for a do-over.
    [/quote]Authoritarian dictatorships don’t need do-overs.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

159 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sandi Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for cervantes Avatar for voreason Avatar for doctorbiobrain Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for inversion Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for go2goal Avatar for nemo Avatar for kitty Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for georgeh Avatar for rickjones Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for ajcurt Avatar for katscherger Avatar for eisenst Avatar for justruss Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: