Even After Trump Twitter Tirade, Senate GOPers Still Meh On Protecting Mueller

United States Senator Lindsey Graham (Republican of South Carolina) questions the witnesses during the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary oversight hearing to examine the Foreign Agents Registration Act and attempt... United States Senator Lindsey Graham (Republican of South Carolina) questions the witnesses during the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary oversight hearing to examine the Foreign Agents Registration Act and attempts to influence United States elections, focusing on lessons learned from current and prior administrations on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Wednesday, July 26, 2017. Credit: Ron Sachs / CNP - NO'WIRE'SERVICE - Photo by: Ron Sachs/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS

Senate Republicans don’t think it would be a good idea for President Trump to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller. But few were willing on Monday to elaborate on what steps need to be taken to protect the special counsel, even after the President and his personal lawyer lashed out at Mueller by name over the weekend.

“I have zero concern that the President is going to fire Mueller. Zero,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told reporters on Capitol Hill Monday, despite having introduced legislation that would prevent Trump from doing so.

Graham —  who on Sunday said that firing Mueller would be “the beginning of the end” of Trump’s presidency – told reporters on Monday that he introduced the bill protecting the special counsel “to let people know where I stand.”

There are currently two bills that would address the threat of Trump terminating Mueller, each with Republican cosponsors.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on them months ago, and Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said on Monday that the committee was still working on working out the differences in the pieces of legislation. Even still, he sounded skeptical that Trump would ax the special counsel.

“I don’t think the President would do that. He shouldn’t do it,” Grassley said, adding that he had “great faith in” Mueller

“The best thing for him as President — since after almost one year, there’s been no show of collusion — seems to me like he’s coming out looking pretty good at this point and he ought to just let it play out, ” he said.

Sen. John Thune (R-SC), the No. 3 Senate Republican, said he didn’t think the legislation was “necessary.”

“I just think that they would be well served not to do anything that messes with or disrupts this process,” he said.

Likewise, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), the Senate GOP whip who also sits on the Judiciary Committee, raised concerns about “picking that fight” with the President.

Trump— perhaps provoked by the fallout over Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ firing of a former top FBI official, or by recent reports that his business had been subpoenaed, or by ongoing negotiations over sitting for an interview with the special counsel — tweeted Saturday that the Mueller investigation “should never have been started. On Sunday Trump alleged that Mueller’s team was filled with “hardened Democrats.” His personal lawyer John Dowd called for Mueller’s firing on Saturday — in a statement he first said was being made on behalf of the President, but then walked back by clarifying that it was from Dowd personally.

The White House lawyer representing Trump in the investigation, Ty Cobb, put out a statement Sunday evening claiming that “the President is not considering or discussing the firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller.”

Cobb’s statement was enough to assure many Republicans, such as Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO), another member of the GOP leadership team.

“The White House has said that they’re not going to do anything on this, so that’s important,” Gardner said.

The one exception was Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), a frequent Trump critic who is not running for re-election this year.

“Just a week ago, he said he wasn’t going to be firing Tillerson, too,” Flake said, referring to Rex Tillerson, the secretary of state whom Trump fired by tweet on Tuesday. “So preemptively, it would behoove our leadership to be forceful and say, ‘This is the line and you cannot cross.'”

Nonetheless, Flake said he had constitutional concerns about legislation protecting Mueller, a potential issue that Grassley also raised.

In January, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said that there was no need for legislation to protect Mueller, because “there’s no effort underway to undermine or to remove the special counsel.” His spokesman did not respond to TPM’s inquiry as to whether McConnell had privately warned Trump against removing Mueller.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), the Senate President pro tempore, in a statement Monday, suggested he had directed such warnings at the White House.

“My conversations with the White House have led me to believe legislation is not necessary at this point because I do not believe the President would take such a foolish action,” Hatch said.

67
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Eunuchs rarely express any desire or interest in many things.

  2. America GOP First!”

  3. “The best thing for him as President — since after almost one year, there’s been no show of collusion — seems to me like he’s coming out looking pretty good at this point and he ought to just let it play out, ” [Grassley] said.

    What’s that old saw about intercourse with chickens?

  4. This is all predictable. At this point is in their best interest for republicans to stand with Trump. Like in medieval battles (and up to the napoleonic wars) as long as an Army stands and fights there is the chance of survival at least for some. When an army turned and run then they were picked up by the cavalry and completely destroyed.

    It’s the same thing now, the GOP has a lousy general engaged them in a battle they cannot win, but as long as they stick together something may be rescued, the Senate for sure. If they start running of the hills and denouncing Trump now then they are for a historic thrashing, way worse that the one they are going to get, because democrats and independents are not going to forgive them this late in the game, and the deplorables would stay home.

    So expect Congressional GOPers that are running for reelection not to do anything that will upset the Trumptards, because those are the only votes they are going to get next November.

  5. The Senate Rs will hold together because they know it’s going to be difficult for Dems to take back the Senate this year, as opposed to 2020 when there will be a lot of Rs running for reelection, But Comey is going to make himself heard very soon in the form of a book, so is McCabe with Bromwich representing him and former CIA director Brennan isn’t going to let up either.

    Oh, did McConnell and the other Rs mention the rubles they had to launder in 2016?

    -Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell used his PAC to accept $2.5 million dollars from a pro-Kremlin oligarch.

    -Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker took $1 million from the same oligarch.

    -Money was also received by Ted Cruz, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich and Marco Rubio, albeit in smaller, less concerning amounts. McConnell’s donation is the real problem for Republicans, as the Palmer Report explains:

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

61 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for robb_ludwig Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for sysprog Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for clemmers Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for gr Avatar for gharlane Avatar for tsp Avatar for rayates Avatar for rickjones Avatar for birdford Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for socalista Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for clare Avatar for fasolt

Continue Discussion