Judge Reams Stone For His Delayed Notice Of His Mueller-Bashing Book Intro

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA - JANUARY 25: Roger Stone, a former advisor to President Donald Trump, speaks to the media after leaving the Federal Courthouse on January 25, 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Mr. Stone was ... FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA - JANUARY 25: Roger Stone, a former advisor to President Donald Trump, speaks to the media after leaving the Federal Courthouse on January 25, 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Mr. Stone was charged by special counsel Robert Mueller of obstruction, giving false statements and witness tampering. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge took Roger Stone to task Tuesday for his delay in notifying her about a book introduction he wrote bashing the special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe — an introduction that appeared to be at odds with a gag order the judge had imposed in his case.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson denied Stone’s request that she clarify that his work on the re-release of the the book — which republished last month under a new title, “The Myth of Russian Collusion” — did not constitute a violation of the gag order. She also suggested that his request, first filed under seal last week, may have been a gambit to gin up publicity about the book.

“In either event, there is no question that the order prohibited and continues to prohibit the defendant from making any public statements, using any medium, concerning the investigation,” the judge said in Tuesday’s order. “It does not matter when the defendant may have first formulated the opinions expressed, or when he first put them into words: he may no longer share his views on these particular subjects with the world.”

The judge had banned Stone from commenting publicly about the case and its participants at a Feb. 21 hearing, after he had posted on Instagram an ominous photo her, with a crosshairs in its background, that was accompanied by an inflammatory caption.

She had, earlier that month, asked him to filing briefing papers on the potential for a gag order. At neither the Feb. 21 hearing on the Instagram post nor in the earlier court filings did Stone mention the release of the retitled book and its new introduction.

According to his filing Friday, which was later released publicly with redactions, Stone had written and edited the new introduction in mid-January. The book had been shipped out to retailers in early February for a February 19 release date. The new introduction suggested Mueller was planning to “frame” Stone on “bogus” charges, and trafficked in all the anti-Deep State hysteria that had been Stone’s M.O. before the recent gag order.

The judge on Tuesday tweaked Stone’s lawyers for saying in their filing Friday that the book “release” was “imminent,” only to explain in a filing on Monday that the use of the “imminent” was a “misnomer.”

She reminded Stone that fact that the gag “order exists at all is entirely the fault of the defendant.”

“And any costs or consequences that will be occasioned by the Court’s reiteration of this clear requirement at this late date are also solely attributable to the defendant, since he deliberately waited until public sales were not only ‘imminent,’ but apparently, ongoing, to inform the Court of the publication effort that had been underway for weeks,” the judge said.

She ordered that by March 11, Stone respond to a number of follow-up inquiries she has about how the new introduction book came together and why she was not informed of it sooner. The status report also must detail “his efforts to come into compliance with the Court’s rulings,” the judge ordered, as well as any promotion he did since mid-January for the book’s re-release.

Stone has been charged with making false statements, obstruction and witness tampering. He has pleaded not guilty.

Read the court filing below:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Beginning to rethink my prediction that she’d give Roger one absolute final last chance. Still probably will, but she’s a sober sensible judge and this is not the language sober sensible judges use when they’re about to give you one last chance.

  2. Good, I really want this douche in jail.

  3. This is almost fascinating to watch. It’s like the rules have never applied to him before and he has no clue how to act.

  4. Apparently she does because he’s still not in jail.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

115 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for slbinva Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for krusher Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for sanni Avatar for tena Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for cologirl Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for edys Avatar for zlj2011 Avatar for outis Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for tammah Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for m_00_m Avatar for captain_america

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: