Report: Prosecutor Resigns From Durham Probe Citing Concerns About Political Pressure

on May 15, 2009 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON - MAY 15: Connecticut prosecutor Nora R. Dannehy gets into a cab as she leaves the Law offices of Patton & Boggs after interviewing Karl Rove May 15, 2009 in Washington, DC. Rove was interviewed by Da... WASHINGTON - MAY 15: Connecticut prosecutor Nora R. Dannehy gets into a cab as she leaves the Law offices of Patton & Boggs after interviewing Karl Rove May 15, 2009 in Washington, DC. Rove was interviewed by Dannehy as part of a criminal investigation into the firing of U.S. attorneys during the Bush Administration. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

There’s one less investigator investigating the investigators.

The Hartford Courant reports that Nora R. Dannehy resigned from the Durham investigation this week. That decision, the paper says, was at least partly motivated by alleged attempts at speeding up the investigation for political reasons by Attorney General Bill Barr.

The report cites colleagues of Dannehy’s, who told the paper that, in the Courant’s words, she “has been concerned in recent weeks by what she believed was pressure from Barr — who appointed Durham — to produce results before the election.”

Citing the same anonymous colleagues, the paper also reports that Dannehy has been considering resignation in recent weeks amid “concern about politics.”

The report offered few specifics about the reasons for Dannehy’s concerns. But it notes that other “Durham associates” believe that Barr has been pressuring him to produce some sort of result before the November election.

It also offers this fairly detailed insight into the life of a Durham investigation prosecutor, as it stands today:

Dannehy was told to expect an assignment of from six months to a year when she agreed to join Durham’s team in Washington, colleagues said. The work has taken far longer than expected, in part because of complications caused by the corona virus pandemic. In the meantime, team members — some of whom are current or former federal investigators or prosecutors with homes in Connecticut — have been working long hours in Washington under pressure to produce results, associates said.

TPM left a message at a phone number listed for Dannehy, and also emailed a spokesperson for Attorney General Barr about the Courant report. Neither have replied to the requests for comment.

But the report comes amid unprecedented politicization of the Justice Department. The DOJ has shown extreme leniency towards friends of the President, asking for a lighter-than-first-recommended sentence for Roger Stone and dropping charges against Michael Flynn, after the former National Security Adviser had already pleaded guilty then withdrew his plea to those charges.

Dannehy is a former U.S. Attorney for Connecticut, and was appointed in 2008 to investigate the firings of U.S. Attorneys under the Bush administration.

Latest Muckraker
226
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. You misspelled “President-ed”.

  2. No surprise here, except that this is public knowledge…Barr has made it clear he wants something out of this report before the election, and I suspect that he’s trying to twist the investigation so that it hits Biden, even tries to portray him as a leader of the effort to “overthrow” Trump. All he needs is something in the investigation that he can glom onto and spin beyond recognition to call Biden a traitor. It’s good that at least one prosecutor has resigned in protest, and made it clear to colleagues that it was over political pressure from Barr. Hopefully we get more information about what that means exactly, it would be very good if this maneuver was undercut before Barr has a chance to deploy it in October.

    This all remains something I never would have expected in my lifetime…people manipulating the justice department to serve the leader is what you see in other nations, not democracies, and certainly not in the US. The fact that we’re here is really sobering…the fact that it might work in the end is terrifying. We can only hope that people aren’t fooled by these desperate acts of the Trump administration to retain power.

  3. Pete Strzok had an interview with Rachel last night and said things which made this development not be as surprising as it could have been.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

220 more replies

Participants

Avatar for kenneth_thomas Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for trnc Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for sniffit Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for drriddle Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for kenga Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for dicktater Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Thane Avatar for kovie Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: