Judge Lays Out Next Steps In Dispute Over Materials Seized From Michael Cohen

UNITED STATES - SEPTEMBER 19: Michael Cohen, a personal attorney for President Trump, and his lawyer Stephen Ryan, off camera, address the media in Hart Building after the Senate Intelligence Committee meeting to discuss Russian interference in the 2016 election was postponed on September 19, 2017. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - SEPTEMBER 19: Michael Cohen, a personal attorney for President Trump, and his lawyer Stephen Ryan, off camera, address the media in Hart Building after the Senate Intelligence Committee meeting to dis... UNITED STATES - SEPTEMBER 19: Michael Cohen, a personal attorney for President Trump, and his lawyer Stephen Ryan, off camera, address the media in Hart Building after the Senate Intelligence Committee meeting to discuss Russian interference in the 2016 election was postponed on September 19, 2017. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

NEW YORK — A federal judge denied Michael Cohen’s request for a temporary restraining order on the government’s review of records seized from him last week. But Judge Kimba Wood instead laid out a process for government lawyers to do a superficial review of the documents, while Cohen’s attorneys are also allowed to review them.

Judge Wood left open the possibility that she could appoint a special master at a later date to conduct a fuller review of the documents for materials that fall under attorney-client privilege. She said it was also possible that she would let a “taint team” go forward with the review. Under typical Justice Department procedure for when an attorney’s documents are seized, a “taint team” of DOJ lawyers not working on the investigation sort out the privileged documents from the evidence.

Wood ordered that the government organize all the seized material in a database to ascertain the amount of evidence that could fall under attorney-client privilege. The review will be done by the taint team, working with attorneys representing Cohen and President Trump, who has intervened in the dispute, using search terms to help organize the evidence. For now, the government will not be reviewing the documents themselves, Wood said. She requested that both sides come to the next hearing with names of potential special masters in mind.

That hearing has not been scheduled yet, and Cohen’s attorneys said they’d prefer two weeks to go over the seized materials, which the government will hand over on a rolling basis.

Wood said she saw this motion as something of a “test” for the two legal teams. She said she wanted to see evidence that each side can come up with “proposals on how we can move fast” to sort through the volumes of seized material.

Wood’s limited determination was still quite a blow for the President’s team, who had argued vociferously that only Trump had the authority to sort through communications related to him to determine which he considered privileged. Trump’s lawyers had opposed the appointment of a special master.

FBI agents raided the office and hotel room of Michael Cohen — Trump’s longtime, self proclaimed “fixer” — last Monday. In filings last week, prosecutors revealed that Cohen has been the subject of a “months long” criminal investigation that they say is focused on his personal business dealings.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for zsak zsak says:

    Taint team. Hope they wear HazMat suits.

  2. Adam Davidson, the New Yorker writer who wrote the recent article about Cohen, is a careful reporter who has spent a lot of time navigating some of Trump’s business deals (he’s also an acquaintance of mine). In his piece, however, he refers to Trump’s company as "a small, sad operation, mostly run by his two oldest children and Michael Cohen."

  3. Avatar for outis outis says:

    Just don’t let Cohen handle the originals. Ooops, sorry. I spilled my coffee on that one marked “Putin gifts.” Ooops, I accidentally drilled through that hard drive. Clumsy me.

  4. Oh, that’s actually good. The Trump lawyers are incompetent, almost by definition as well as performance, which means they will either try to declare everything should be restricted or else pick and choose only the most suspicious/damning items. In either case, I suspect the judge will then require them to prove why each document (or class of documents) should be covered. In the first case, she likely will just say no and let the government have everything, while in the second the questioning, and the documents, will point the investigators in the direction of the bad things that have been done. Even if they don’t get the documents the first time, that gives them a path to follow for the next warrant that will get them the documents.

    This is just amazing theater to watch…and it’s all being done through the courts and openly, which is a good thing. In many ways, this is better than waiting for Mueller’s report, which can be declared biased and swept under the rug. Now, we just have to wait and see if what we all think is going on really comes out…I suspect Cohen will be found to have engaged in criminal activity, but whether we get a connection to Trump remains to be seen.

  5. This is too similar to the “hanging chad” cluster f%%k of the 2000 election. OTOH, there is a Federal judge involved.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

118 more replies

Participants

Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for yellowdogfox Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for crunchyfrog Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tena Avatar for demyankee Avatar for fraufeix Avatar for tpr Avatar for socalista Avatar for kentford Avatar for dvdf1126 Avatar for philip99

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: