House Holds Bannon In Criminal Contempt Over Jan. 6 Subpoena Refusal

President Trump, Chief Strategist Steve Bannon looks on in the East Room of the White House on February 10, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Photo by Olivier Douliery/Abaca(Sipa via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In a 229-202 vote, the House moved to hold Steve Bannon in criminal contempt of Congress.

The vote means that Bannon will be referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia for potential prosecution over defying a congressional subpoena issued by the Jan. 6 Committee.

Democrats were joined by committee co-chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and panel member Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) in the vote. Reps. Peter Meijer (R-MI) and Anthony Gonzalez (R-OH), Fred Upton (R-MI), Jamie Herrera-Beutler (R-WA), John Katko (R-NY), – all of whom voted to impeach Trump over inciting the insurrection – voted in favor of the contempt resolution as well. Reps. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) did not vote to impeach Trump, but did vote in favor of the contempt resolution.

The panel sent Bannon the subpoena last month along with three other Trump cronies, demanding information about the run-up to the Capitol insurrection and about reported conversations that he had with Trump before the attack.

Bannon raised a series of groundless, executive privileged-based concerns as a justification for not complying with the subpoena. He last served in the White House in August 2017.

After the former Trump campaign chairman skipped out on an Oct. 14 deposition, the panel initiated contempt proceedings.

Those concluded on Thursday with the successful House vote to cite him with contempt. That kicks the ball into the Justice Department’s court on whether to file charges against Bannon, potentially holding him accountable for refusing to cooperate with the investigation into the events of the insurrection.

The D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office is currently without a Senate-confirmed leader, however. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) is reportedly holding up the confirmation of nominee Matt Graves, demanding information from the DOJ on the supposedly “unequal application of justice between the individuals who breached the Capitol on Jan. 6, and those involved in the unrest during the spring and summer of 2020.”

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Good and it was bipartisan! Now onto DOJ.

  2. Yawn. Wake me when Meek Garland stands up for democracy.

  3. Send him to the showers!

  4. No, that’s OK. Why don’t you just sleep through it? It’s less effort.

  5. Doesn’t everyone?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

208 more replies

Participants

Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for trnc Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for irasdad Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for darcy Avatar for esva Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for hoagie Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for blogamator Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for katscherger Avatar for bcgister Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for dicktater Avatar for n_b Avatar for visionseeker Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: