Feds Will Allow Hospitals To Divert ER Patients To Avoid COVID Overload

QUEENS, NEW YORK - MARCH 30: Two members of the Emergency Medical Team of the Fire Department of New York prepare their gurney before going on another ambulance call at the Elmhurst Hospital Center in the Queens boro... QUEENS, NEW YORK - MARCH 30: Two members of the Emergency Medical Team of the Fire Department of New York prepare their gurney before going on another ambulance call at the Elmhurst Hospital Center in the Queens borough of New York City on March 30, 2020. New York City is the epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States, putting historic pressure on a world-renowned healthcare system as the number of confirmed cases and deaths in the area grows. (Photo by Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

After lobbying from Washington state officials, the Trump administration decided on Monday to issue an unprecedentedly broad order allowing hospital emergency rooms nationwide to divert patients away from their wards.

The change will allow emergency rooms to send patients for screening away from the hospital campus.

That would normally be banned under a 1980s federal law which prohibits emergency rooms from turning patients away without diagnosis and treatment. The change suspends enforcement of the law so far as it applies to screening patients, allowing ERs to screen potential patients away from the emergency facility to test people for signs of COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus.

The change applies nationally under what is known as a blanket waiver.

The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services made the policy shift after lobbying from Washington state and professional associations representing ER doctors and hospitals.

Washington state officials had agitated for the change under a wide-ranging petition to the federal government for emergency changes to the state’s Medicaid program in order to respond to the crisis. In its application, Washington had pushed for a blanket waiver to the law, and not for one that applied only for the state.

CMS’s decision to issue the waiver signals the severity of the crisis, in part because of the extent to which the baseline guarantee of treatment at an emergency room is embedded into the U.S. health care system.

One health policy analyst previously told TPM that the law was a “bottom-line protection for people in the United States.”

Waivers to the law – the 1986 Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act – have seldom been issued broadly. Typically, the federal government suspends enforcement of the law for fixed periods of time in response to localized disasters that tax the resources of overburdened hospital emergency departments, while closely monitoring how patient volume changes.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. It was that no good west coast state that applied for this, so ignore it. Things get real in the power centers of the east coast and all of a sudden they start paying attention.

  2. Avatar for bob-o bob-o says:

    I would tend to trust the Washington state officials on this. It’s a major move, and of course we fear what the maladministration might do in the future, but if WA is asking for it, I’ll err on the side of trust.

  3. There is a really valid financial reason for the basic rule, but in the pandemic there is a more important reason for the waiver. I am glad to here they are being proactive.

  4. It’s getting real for the feds. And by feds, I mean the president. :roll_eyes:

  5. Wonder if this is going to conveniently remain in place if/when the Trump Pandemic subsides.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

12 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for yskov Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for hagarwood Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for pandastirfry Avatar for edhedh Avatar for asturcot Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for maximus Avatar for bob-o Avatar for zillacop Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for crsmart2

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: