Feds Don’t Know If Alleged Assange Hack Succeeded

LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 011: Wikileaks founder Julian Assange arrives at Westminster Magistrates Court by police van after being arrested on April 11, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by Jack Taylor/Getty Images)
LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 11: Julian Assange gestures to the media from a police vehicle on his arrival at Westminster Magistrates court on April 11, 2019 in London, England. After weeks of speculation Wikileaks found... LONDON, ENGLAND - APRIL 11: Julian Assange gestures to the media from a police vehicle on his arrival at Westminster Magistrates court on April 11, 2019 in London, England. After weeks of speculation Wikileaks founder Julian Assange was arrested by Scotland Yard Police Officers inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in Central London this morning. Ecuador's President, Lenin Moreno, withdrew Assange's Asylum after seven years citing repeated violations to international conventions. (Photo by Jack Taylor/Getty Images) MORE LESS

The government does not know if an alleged hacking conspiracy between Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and Army intelligence officer Chelsea Manning succeeded, according to a newly released December 2017 affidavit from an FBI agent on the case.

“While it remains unknown whether Manning and Assange were successful in cracking the password, a follow-up message from Assange to Manning on March 10, 2010, reflects that Assange was actively trying to crack the password pursuant to their agreement,” reads the affidavit, filed by special agent Megan Brown. 

Assange was arrested in London last week on a U.S. extradition request, based on a March 2018 indictment accusing him of trying to help Manning “crack” a Defense Department password.

Brown writes in the newly unsealed affidavit that she was assigned to the FBI’s counterespionage squad in the Washington D.C. field office in February 2017. She then goes into a detailed list of allegations surrounding information that Manning supposedly shared with Assange, before proceeding to the alleged password-cracking conspiracy.

Prosecutors allege that the password-cracking attempt occurred in March 2010. If successful, prosecutors say, cracking the password would have given Manning access to a wider range of potentially classified information.

The key point in the alleged conspiracy is an instance in which Manning allegedly gave Assange part of a hash, a way to conceal a password using an algorithm. By giving the hash value, Manning could have allowed Assange to decode a U.S. government password.

“Manning would have needed the part of the hash from the system file as well to obtain the full value,” the affidavit reads.

On March 10, texts attached to the affidavit show, Assange allegedly messaged Manning asking for “any more hints” about the hash, adding “no luck so far.”

The next messages appear six days later, per an exhibit attached to the affidavit.

“Investigators have not recovered a response by Manning to Assange’s question, and there is no other evidence as to what Assange did, if anything, with respect to the password,” the affidavit reads. “The next chats that investigators were able to recover were dated March 16, 2010.”

“Nevertheless, the recovered chats described above reflect an agreement between Manning and Assange to crack the hash,” the FBI agent adds.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Muckraker
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: