Dossier Firm’s Lawyers Accuse Devin Nunes Of ‘Unprofessional Conduct’

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., listens during the committee’s hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, March 20, 2017, on allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., listens during the committee’s hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, March 20, 2017, on allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S... House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., listens during the committee’s hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, March 20, 2017, on allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Lawyers representing the firm that put together the so-called Trump dossier wrote a scathing letter to House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA)  — who has recused himself from the committee’s Russia probe, but nonetheless issued subpoenas to the firm — accusing Nunes and his staff of operating with a “pattern of unprofessional conduct.”

“Now that you, and by extension, your staff, have proven to be unreliable partners in good faith negotiations, we cannot reasonably be expected to trust anything that you or your staff would represent to us,” the lawyers for Fusion GPS said Monday in the letter. “We cannot in good conscience do anything but advise our clients to stand on their constitutional privileges, the attorney work product doctrine and contractual obligations.”

The lawyers signaled that Fusion GPS would not be turning over the documents Nunes’ subpoena requested (though the firm did preserve them). The lawyers said that, if compelled to appear in front of the committee, Fusion GPS representatives would invoke their constitutional privileges not to testify. They laid out a number of reasons they believed Nunes and his staff had acted in “bad faith” in issuing the subpoenas, including him doing so unilaterally despite his recusal as well as various “infirmities” in the subpoenas themselves.

The dossier and the private investigators who put it together have become of interest to the various entities investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson was interviewed for 10 hours by the Senate Judiciary Committee and Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team has reportedly met with the dossier’s author Christopher Steele, a former British spy.

In their letter Monday, Fusion GPS’ lawyers said the firm had been working with committee staff on finding a “path toward voluntary cooperation,” until Nunes surprised them with a set of subpoenas issued Oct. 4 for documents and testimony in the coming weeks.

“Despite your recusal from the Committee’s Russia investigation after falling under scrutiny by the House Ethics Committee, your unilateral issuance of these subpoenas violates your recusal and further undermines the legitimacy of this investigation,” the letter said.

According to the Fusion GPS letter, the subpoenas appear to have included instructions for the CIA instead of for Fusion GPS — a product, the lawyers said, of  Nunes’ “haste to circumvent your own Committee’s investigation, rules, process and Ranking Member.”

The lawyers also accused Nunes’ staff of leaving off committee rules normally attached to subpoenas “either out of malice or as a consequence of your haste to circumvent the Committee’s process and its Ranking Members.”

The lawyers went on to suggest that Nunes’ actions could have a chilling effect on organizations like Fusion GPS that engage in political research.

“The subpoenas here seek to expose the confidential internal records of an organization involved in political activity merely to harass a group whose work you as Chairman want to discredit for political reasons,” they said.

A spokesman for Nunes did not respond to TPM’s request for comment.

In April, Nunes announced he was recusing himself from House Intel’s Russia probe, after scrutiny of his decision to brief President Trump on information he’d received on alleged Obama administration “unmasking” without first checking in with the rest of the committee.

He has continued, however, to insert himself in Russia-related matters, including in his interaction with the dossier firm as well as his threats to hold Justice Department officials in contempt over their refusal to turn over dossier-related documents.

Read the full letter to Nunes below:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. I bet this was a fun letter to write. Nothing like having an easy target who has such obvious motives.

  2. Nunes is desperately trying to cover his own ass in all of this.

    He was a member of Pence’s “Vetting” committee that approved every person who has already resigned or been kicked out of the Trump Administration, and those who are still there running for cover.

    Nunes is just as dirty in all this as Pence is, which is saying a LOT.

  3. Poison, meet well.

  4. Nunes is the quintessential political flunky. He is so desperate for a pat on the head from the head of the Trump regime,that he is willing to breach any and all ethical considerations. Nunes’ behavior is the kind of behavior that will get him elected on the first ballot to the Political Hall of Shame.

  5. Wow! Nunes? Unprofessional conduct??

    Never saw that one coming…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

60 more replies

Participants

Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for sysprog Avatar for jep07 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for dont Avatar for breakingdeadmen Avatar for nymund Avatar for kitty Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for longriver Avatar for benthere Avatar for tena Avatar for klw57 Avatar for awintexas Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for tiowally Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for cpease Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for pauldownard Avatar for longtermobserver Avatar for karlwlewis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: