Conservatives Co-Opt The ‘Don’t Name the Shooter’ Cause

A woman visits a makeshift memorial near the road leading to Umpqua Community College, Saturday, Oct. 3, 2015, in Roseburg, Ore. Armed with multiple guns, Chris Harper Mercer walked in a classroom at the community co... A woman visits a makeshift memorial near the road leading to Umpqua Community College, Saturday, Oct. 3, 2015, in Roseburg, Ore. Armed with multiple guns, Chris Harper Mercer walked in a classroom at the community college, Thursday, and opened fire, killing several and wounding several others. (AP Photo/John Locher) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

After a gunman killed nine people Thursday at Oregon’s Umpqua Community College, conservatives adopted an idea that was previously the territory of gun control activists: not naming the perpetrators of mass shootings.

Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin, who has been a vocal opponent of gun control and is in charge of investigating the massacre, took that stand in a Thursday press conference.

“I will not name the shooter,” Hanlin said. “I will not give him the credit he probably sought prior to this horrific and cowardly act.”

Since then, many news outlets have reported that the gunman is Chris Harper Mercer, 26, based on information from anonymous law enforcement officials. But some personalities on the more conservative side of the spectrum, including Fox News hosts Gretchen Carlson and Megyn Kelly. declined to name the shooter on air.

Joe Scarborough, the co-host of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” said Monday morning that he too wished news outlets would withhold mass shooters’ names to deprive them of recognition.

“I think, in part, it is an effort for people to get attention,” Scarborough said Monday morning. “I really wish we could stop giving the names of these people who are committing these heinous crimes, in large part for the attention. Because they go out in their twisted minds as folk heroes.”

It’s a stance that may sound familiar to supporters of tougher regulations on guns. Caren Teves, whose 24-year-old son, Alex, was killed in the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting, has become a strong proponent of efforts to stop gun violence, and started the No Notoriety campaign earlier this year along with her husband to challenge media outlets to cover mass shooters responsibly and not reward them with fame.

Teves told TPM in a Monday phone interview that she’s seen a groundswell of support for the campaign in the wake of the shooting at Umpqua Community College.

“I know this Oregon shooter had posted something somewhere saying ‘The more blood that is split I see the more attention people get.’ So the media knows it’s a motivating factor,” she told TPM. “Forensic psychiatrists know it’s a motivating factor. The FBI has a ‘Don’t Name Them’ campaign which is very similar to No Notoriety. It is a well studied and proven effect. But I just believe now the public is starting to realize the same.”

Asked for reaction to conservatives’ calls to withhold the Oregon shooter’s name, Teves welcomed the support.

“I find that no matter where you are on the spectrum it seems to be something that goes across the aisle,” she told TPM, adding: “I believe that at that moment they’re making the right decision in the interest of not giving the shooter notoriety.”

Teves and her husband, Tom, also appeared Sunday on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.” Host Brian Stelter asked the couple what they’d say to journalists who argue they have an obligation to report a mass shooter’s name and dig into that shooter’s past.

“No one’s saying don’t name them,” Tom Teves said. “You can name them once. Just don’t be gratuitous. Don’t make them into anti-heroes and please don’t call them monsters. That’s what they want. Don’t give it to them.”

By way of proof, Caren Teves pointed to a recent study in which researchers at Arizona State University found that mass killings and school shootings were “contagious” for a period of 13 days, meaning there was an increased likelihood that a similar incident would take place in that time.

The study’s lead author, Sherry Towers, told Newsweek after the shooting in Oregon that media coverage contributed to that contagion effect.

“What we found was, in ones that didn’t get a lot of media attention there was no contagion, and in the ones where we did see a lot of media attention, that’s where we saw the contagion,” she told Newsweek.

Towers told The Associated Press that her analysis derived largely from news reports. But it was unclear whether naming mass shooters actually caused more violence since the gunmen’s names were part of every news story, she told the AP.

Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun control group founded by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, doesn’t identify mass shooters in its own communications, spokeswoman Erika Soto Lamb told TPM. Like Teves, Lamb also suggested that support for withholding mass shooters’ names from the pro-gun crowd was significant.

“I think that’s a meaningful shift in how we talk about guns and these events in our country,” she told TPM. “The focus should be on saving lives from gun violence and not on using the shooter. We want to understand what happened so we can prevent more tragedies but in our view it’s not about the shooter.”

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for gr gr says:

    “Don’t Name the Shooter’ …”

    This is one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in a long, long time and I’ve been on this planet more decades than most.

    Yean! Dat’s it! Dat’s da ticket! Don’t name da name! Dat’ll show 'em. Dat’ll stop dese shootin’s!

    We humans are a pathetic lot.

  2. Avatar for lew lew says:

    Kill a bunch of people with easily available guns–no names please!

    Have a baby out of wedlock–slut shaming!

    Today’s modern GOP, brought to you by thorazine.

  3. Wonder if the same standard will apply if the shooter’s name is Achmed or Mohammed? Or if it happens to be a Pedro who overstayed his visa?

    I’m pretty certain we’ll be getting all of the info on those shooters.

  4. The point of naming the shooter, and giving information on them, is to shine light on the motivations that drove the incident. If it’s random insanity, then sure keep it under a blanket. But if the cause is terrorist, foreign or homegrown, then people should know because that can lead to an informed response. In this case, it just might be that this person was part of the anti-government fringe that seems to bubble beneath the surface out there in the Pacific Northwest. I’d bet that is why the usual conservative suspects are throwing a blanket on it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

58 more replies

Participants

Avatar for victorabrahamsen Avatar for rxbusa Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for gr Avatar for astro_walker Avatar for rbinnc Avatar for canadian Avatar for va_dawg Avatar for sufi66 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for 1933john Avatar for randall_p Avatar for psychobroad Avatar for origamitrain

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: