WH Blocked Key Mueller Witness From Testifying More Than 200 Times

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 10: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) presides over a hearing about the Mueller Reporter in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill June 10, 2019 in Washington, ... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 10: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) presides over a hearing about the Mueller Reporter in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill June 10, 2019 in Washington, DC. The committee heard testimony from former Chief White House Counsel John Dean, who went to prison for his role in the Watergate burglaries and subsequent cover-up and became a key witness for the investigation and ultimate resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Annie Donaldson, the former chief of staff to White House counsel Don McGahn and a crucial witness in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, found herself blocked from replying to questions from a House panel more than 200 times because of “constitutionally-based Executive Branch confidentiality interests.”

The 55-page list of responses from Donaldson records 212 separate assertions of the clunky phrase, which appears to demand confidentiality without formally asserting executive privilege.

Donaldson issued the responses after House Judiciary Committee chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) subpoenaed her, along with former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks, for testimony and documents in May as part of the panel’s probe into possible obstruction of justice by President Trump.

Across the responses, Donaldson replied with the same boilerplate statement that the White House had asserted that the subject of the response was confidential.

“The White House has directed that I not respond to this question because of the constitutionally-based Executive Branch confidentiality interests that are implicated,” the statement reads.

In a few cases, Donaldson added some detail when declining to answer a question.

For example, in response to a question about whether Donaldson knows about a July 22, 2017, conversation in which Trump allegedly told then-White House chief of staff Reince Priebus to get Attorney General Jeff Sessions to resign immediately, Donaldson replied with the following:

“I am aware of a conversation between Mr. Priebus and Mr. McGahn, although I do not, today, have an independent recollection of whether or not I was present for any such conversation between Mr. Priebus and Mr. McGahn, or subsequently learned about this event.”

She then repeated the boilerplate non-assertion of executive privilege.

Read the transcript of Donaldson’s responses — or lack thereof — here:

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for outis outis says:

    But Trump claims that his adminstration cooperated fully (and that there was no collusion or obstruction) . . . and any number of other absurd statements.

  2. lawsuits are fun

  3. Tomorrow I’m going to fail to show up to work, and invoke my “corporate board-supporting strategic alignment of interests vis-a-vis ordered direction” if anyone asks. It makes exactly as much sense as this does

  4. Lawsuits to compel McGahn/Hicks/Donaldson testimony have still not been filed. Folks can make up whatever excuses they want for this, but no one can accuse the House Dems of showing a sense of urgency here. We all know a GOP run committee wouldn’t have hesitated to get into court on stuff like this. We’ve honestly learned more about #trumprussia from GOP led hearings than Dem controlled hearings.

    Leaders of Institutions used to defend institutional power. Now, we’re in the era of ‘shrug politics’.

  5. What the heck is the difference between replying “constitutionally-based Executive Branch confidentiality interests” and “formally asserting executive privilege”?

    Sure looks same to me.

    And why is Toadglans so hesitent to assert executive privilege? He does everything else, whether it’s legal or not.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

133 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for hoppy Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for jackster Avatar for cervantes Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for nemo Avatar for bboerner Avatar for pine Avatar for darrtown Avatar for gharlane Avatar for tena Avatar for georgeh Avatar for Ken_a_roni Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for j.dave Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for joce_m Avatar for taylor Avatar for PacificSparkles Avatar for deadboi Avatar for kieran Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: