Analysis Finds ‘Multiple Irregularities’ In Distribution Of NJ Sandy Aid

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks during a news conference Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, at the Statehouse in Trenton, N.J. Christie has fired a top aide who engineered political payback against a town mayor, saying s... New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks during a news conference Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, at the Statehouse in Trenton, N.J. Christie has fired a top aide who engineered political payback against a town mayor, saying she lied. Deputy Chief of Staff Bridget Anne Kelly is the latest casualty in a widening scandal that threatens to upend Christie's second term and likely run for president in 2016. Documents show she arranged traffic jams to punish the mayor, who didn't endorse Christie for re-election. (AP Photo/Mel Evans) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An analysis published Monday in the wake of allegations against New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) found “multiple irregularities” in Hurricane Sandy relief funds handed out by the sate.

The analysis by WNYC, NJ Spotlight, and New Jersey Public Radio came after Hoboken, N.J. Mayor Dawn Zimmer said members of Christie’s administration had threatened to withhold Sandy funds from her city unless she approved a real estate project.

The analysis found Hoboken received less storm relief than smaller cities that had less damage, a finding NJ Spotlight’s Scott Gurian noted “could lend credence to Zimmer’s claim.”

The report specifically analyzed the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Energy Allocation Initiative, which is at the center of Zimmer’s allegations. It found Hoboken had received $142,080 from the program. That’s less, for instance, than the city of Nutley, which got $556,000 and was described by Gurian as having been “relatively unscathed” by the storm.

Christie administration officials have denied political factors played a role in the distribution of Sandy aid and pointed to approximately $70 million Hoboken and its residents received after the storm. However, the new analysis noted that money largely “came directly from the federal government” and “was aimed at individuals and business owners rather than at Hoboken’s city government.”

In spite of these findings, Gurian said the analysis found nothing that conclusively confirms Zimmer’s accusation.

“There is no proof at this point that politics necessarily played a role in state decisions about who got help and who did not in the aftermath of Sandy,” he wrote.

An official from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection responded to questions about the analysis from NJ Spotlight. According to Gurian, the official insisted aid applications were reviewed through a proper, objective process. The official also noted the process was ongoing and some of the aid might still be adjusted.

Latest Muckraker
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: