Grassley On Trump Picking SCOTUS Nom: ‘I Would Have To Admit It’s A Gamble’

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, arrives for a committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2016. Senate Republicans, most vocally Majority Leader Mitch McConnell... Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, arrives for a committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2016. Senate Republicans, most vocally Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, are facing a high-stakes political showdown with President Barack Obama sparked by the recent death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Republicans controlling the Senate — which must confirm any Obama appointee before the individual is seated on the court — say that the decision is too important to be determined by a lame-duck president. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) acknowledged a flaw in his unyielding stance that the next president should fill the ninth seat on the Supreme Court, saying Thursday on a radio show that it was a “gamble” to wait and see what kind of justice a President Donald Trump would nominate, as reported by the Huffington Post.

Asked on Iowa’s “In Depth” whether the current GOP blockade was risky since President Obama’s pick Merrick Garland was more moderate than the type of judge Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders would likely appoint, Grassley reiterated the Republican line that the hardline position is about letting the voters have a voice.

“For people like me that want someone of a [Justice Antonin] Scalia variety to be on the Supreme Court or at least tending in that direction, we’ve got to know that if Hillary Clinton is elected president, it won’t be a Scalia-type person. If Trump’s elected president, it probably is a little more unknown than if there’s a [Sen. Ted] Cruz elected president, or a Kasich elected president” Grassley said, before musing on what Trump has said about his potential nominees.

“I would have to admit it’s a gamble,” he said.

Grassley is the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which typically hosts hearings and committee votes on Supreme Court nominees before they move to a full Senate vote. He and the other Republicans on the committee signed a letter saying they would not host a hearing or vote for any nominee put forth by Obama, though some Republicans including Grassley have since granted Garland a courtesy meeting.

“I haven’t second-guessed myself,” Grassley said. “It’s a gamble on who’s going to be the next president of the United States. I second-guess that. But I guess that’s a point that I’m willing to take.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Way to confirm that when the President is black, he only gets 3/5ths of a term.

  2. It’s still low-risk for the Republicans. They don’t have to vote on anyone Trump might nominate, either. If they keep holding out until they get someone they like in the White House, we might eventually find ourselves with Supreme Court that has no members at all.

  3. Someone will need to explain the basics to Trump. Yes it can be a women,or a minority. No it can’t be a goat, you know…the basics.

  4. They’ve made obstruction completely normative. It’s like living with chronic political constipation.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

56 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for paulw Avatar for victorabrahamsen Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for caterpillar Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for jep07 Avatar for humpback Avatar for scottnatlanta Avatar for rudesan Avatar for invitedguest Avatar for rev Avatar for jimellis Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jinnj Avatar for dmblum Avatar for dave_h Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for xp9dnxx

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: